Landmark designation and call-up process

I urge you to call up item five on the agenda for a full and meaningful hearing on the resoning of the BMC property.

I'm speaking this evening to urge you to call up item five on your agenda.

city council considered whether to call up the site review

most of the incentives for landmark designation are modifications in the code

what individual landmark designation provides is a deeper dive into the social history of each property

The options in front of you this evening are to either approve the application or sorry recommend designation to city council

Item four on our agenda is call-up items.

we had uh an item that was up for callup consideration and that item went away.

it will go to council for callup consideration. Council may vote to call this item up for a hearing to provide additional feedback if they wish

Uh city council did call up that decision. So now city council will make the final decision um based on the criteria.

Uh so city council's first decision was whether or not to call up

the landmarks board unanimously voted to recommend the landmark designation of the property

The application was submitted in April and on July 1st, the landmarks board unanimously voted to recommend landmark designation for the property.

Our call-up check-ins are item number five on tonight's agenda. 5A is the consideration of a landmark alteration certificate application

Consideration of a Landmark Alteration Certificate application for changes within the landmark boundary of the Glen Huntington Bandshell

are pending individual landmark designation and were approved for relocation and rehabilitation by the landmarks board

So those two changes, the call up and the automatic planning board hearing um with this ordinance had a really significant impact.

things from landmark alteration certificates, the typical time is 9 days

Our call-up check-ins are item four on the agenda tonight. 4 A is the consideration of a landmark alteration certificate application

Consideration of a Landmark Alteration Certificate application to relocate an accessory building at 1733 Canyon Blvd., an individual landmark

All right, I'm not seeing any. So, that wraps up our call-up check-ins.

Our call-up check-ins are item number four on tonight's agenda.

Public hearing and consideration of a Landmark Alteration Certificate application (HIS2026-00192) to relocate an accessory building

This application is subject to potential call-up on or before July 28, 2026.

This approval is subject to call-up on or before June 26, 2026.

Call Up Item: Use Review to convert an existing ground floor office space at 2521 Broadway Unit A into a three-bedroom residential unit

Our next call up check up check in is item 5B and it is the consideration of a landmark alteration certificate to demolish

Consideration of a Landmark Alteration Certificate to demolish an existing accessory building at 1039 Mapleton Ave.

these problems that maybe make it seem like it's being weaponized or used to harm or restrict positive change in our community

If designated, the property will become Boulder's 222nd individual landmark, and future exterior changes will be reviewed through a landmark alteration certificate

Item B is also a landmark alteration certificate application consideration to relocate a building

Our call-up check-ins are item number five on tonight's agenda

Consideration of a Landmark Alteration Certificate application to relocate a building (Arapahoe House)

Consideration of a Landmark Alteration Certificate application to relocate a building (Chestnut House)

So in my view, this, property does not meet our standards for landmark designation under the criteria.

Speaker 8 (Board & Commissions): That initiated the, landmark designation on this.

usually City Council has 16 days to decide to review, call up the decision

The Landmarks Board voted not to initiate designation on 3 of the houses, and voted to initiate landmark designation process for the house at 990 Arapaho.

So as we discussed earlier, in February, the Landmarks Board considered issuance of the demolition approvals or initiation of landmark designation process for the four houses.

5D is the consideration of a landmark alteration certificate to demolish an existing accessory building

Consideration of a Landmark Alteration Certificate to demolish an existing accessory building

This application is subject to a potential call-up on or before March 31st. 2026.

Item 4A is a call-up item. Call-up is a site review, for the partial redevelopment

Can we go to our call-up check-in, please?

Finding that the proposals meet the standards for issuance of a landmark alteration certificate in Chapter 9

As a reminder of the next steps, the applicant has up to 10 minutes to present to the board.

something like 33 individual landmark designations, and I know that these are near and dear to your heart

the buildings are eligible for landmark designation and will be approved for demolition unless the Landmarks Board initiates the landmark designation process before the stay of demolition expires

The board can consider any factor in its decision this evening. And that's very different than every other hearing you all see, whether it's a landmark alteration certificate, demolition hearing

Unlike quasi-judicial demolition or landmark designation hearings, initiation hearings are legislative, so the board may consider any factors in its decision at this step in the process.

Any questions, comments, or desire to call this one up?

we shifted the majority of design review cases from committee to staff.

The LDRC reviewed 30%, down from 63% the year before, and the Landmarks Board only reviewed 2 LAC applications last year.

the application, would go to City Council that can vote to call up the item for additional feedback if they so choose

So all in favor of the motion to call up the project, please raise your hand.

This is the public hearing and consideration of a landmark alteration certificate application

that means that on February 4th, the City Council will have this item on their consent agenda

we don't believe that the buildings meet the criteria for landmark designation.

On October 8th, the Landmarks Design Review Committee referred the applications to the full Landmarks Board for review

I do believe 976 Arapaho Avenue is eligible for individual landmark designation, so for this item

Have the opportunity To call up a project, correct?

This call-up period expires on December 3rd, 2025.

I move that we call up the development project of 1840 and 1844 Falsam Street.

Our call-up check-in is item 4A on tonight's agenda.

that's an eligible building as a condition of site review. you should landmark that building

any changes to that landmark alteration certificate would have to go before the landmarks were as well.

I make a motion to uh call up um the uh site review

Uh I'm a yes on the call uh call up in agreement with my colleagues

The options in front of you this evening are to approve the demolition request, or place a stay of demolition to allow time to consider alternatives.

We now move to agenda item number 4, call-up items. We have two possible call-up items today.

And that would be subject to call-up by Planning Board

Our next item are our callup check-ins which are item five on tonight's agenda.

So, I guess my read on this comment… is… In the context of… planning board and city council call-up here

And then in August, city council voted unanimously to call up these applications.

City Council uh asked for it to be called up uh earlier and we are ready to go.

Our call-up check-ins are item number five on tonight's agenda.

conditionally approve the application for a landmark alteration certificate to relocate an existing accessory building

finding that the proposal meets the standards for issuance of a landmark alteration certificate

I think the worst case scenario from a preservation standpoint is that the boundaries are carved out, and nothing changes within those boundaries.

can you confirm that if we pass the annexation agreement that is the amendment that is on the consent agenda, those buildings will still be landmarked

So it is already designated. The condition of the building is that that project is in construction.

We would then have the chance to call up that decision if we felt like we wanted to go in a different direction.

I wasn't thinking that we'd be doing straw polls on a call up and giving direction in that way.

We're also on track for landmark designations with 2 landmarks board public hearings.

And then the approved landmark alteration, certificate plans, and then code enforcement, if needed, is kind of a separate process.

it would have to come back to the Landmarks board for discussion, and ultimately a recommendation from you to de landmark that

Consider removing the landmark designation primarily to benefit the low, to moderate income affordable housing owners

So any changes they would make within the landmark boundary on the site would have to go through a landmark alteration certificate.

There was also a landmark alteration certificate approved under his 2025 0 0 4 8, and that was for the parcel demolition of a house constructed in 1925.

What has changed is that we now ask the Landmarks board to determine eligibility of a building

the building is not eligible for landmark designation

to prevent the loss of buildings that may have historic or architectural significance, and to provide the time necessary to initiate landmark designation

If designated, the property will become Boulder's 221st individual landmark, and future exterior changes will be reviewed through a landmark alteration certificate.

This application is subject to potential call up on or before. June 23rd 2025.

I would clarify that when councils. deciding whether to call up something or another, they're not debating the substance of the matter

Our call-up check-ins are item four on tonight's agenda.

I also really appreciate the policy of reviewing the demolition of buildings more than 50 years old.

I'll call this up as well. Okay, so great. We have 2, and it's called up.

But I want everyone to not mistake discussing a call up item, to be a the call up itself right?

Now we can move on from minutes to discussion of call ups and continuations.

I move that the Landmarks Board recommends to the City Council that it designate the property

We will now turn to public comment for this landmark designation hearing

It'll go to city council for their call-up consideration

The approval is subject to call up on or before May 6, 2025.

This is the statistics from last year of where the where the levels of review break breakdown.

so call up call up decision, or an you know, a 3rd party could file a rule 106 review action in court

Even though we've modified our call up criteria. Someone from the public can still call up an item.

Thanks so much. Can we go to our call-up check-in, please? Yes, sir. Thank you. Our call-up check-in tonight is item 4A

We respectfully requesting city council call up our 1855 flat project tonight so we can time.

Our 1855 Flat Iron Court project is on your agenda tonight for call-up consideration.

the current process does require that the property owner must wait three weeks after a landmarks board meeting

while the largest amount of time is for landmark and historic district designations

You may initiate designation. You can not initiate landmark designation, or you can approve the demolition application.

The next consideration is whether the building needs protection provided through designation.

Last month the Board voted to schedule this hearing, to initiate, to consider initiating landmark designation

Again, form-based codes are still subject to call up by the planning board.

and then I haven't heard any interest in calling it up so I think that concludes that item

I also would like to call up the environmental advisory board now

our callup check-ins are item number four on tonight's agenda

I'm up for making a motion that the Landmarks Board recommend to City Council that it designate the property

The program accepted the application to designate the property as an individual landmark in December

your options this evening are to either recommend landmark designation to city council

Then there's the opportunity for a call up with council and that type of thing.

determining whether there's probable cause to believe the building may be eligible or not

the criteria for your review for this individual Landmark designation is found in section 9111 and 911 two of the boulder Revis code

following the demolition of a principal building after a finding of probable cause that it may be eligible for landmark designation in an initial review

Finding that the building is not eligible for individual landmark designation consistent with the purposes and standards

Does anyone have any comments, or would like to consider calling this item up.

So for next steps following tonight's concept plan, review, hearing city council might vote to call up the item

So say, during a meeting, you're gonna call up an item.

is a landmark alteration certificate application to install solar panels at the front of the Higman house

we'll also be um contributing to the Heritage for all uh recognizing a broader history in the landmark designations

applications for landmark alteration certificates and 10 applications for demolitions and then six uh applications for new landmarks

check-in item 4B for a landmark alteration certificate application to modify the front Dormer and entry of the house

all right so is anyone interested in making a motion to call this project up

our first call up check-in this evening is item number 4A and that is a consideration of a site review Amendment

the applicant shall be responsible for completing the work in compliance with the approved plans

I move that the landmarks board adopt the staff memorandum dated November 20th 2024 as the findings of the board

that moves us to our public hearing items and our first one is agenda 5A this is a public hearing and consideration of a landmark alteration certificate application

One is the landmark designation process and owner consent versus opposition

It doesn't jump to. You must landmark your building in order to get this increased density.

then on September 4th the landmarks board held a public hearing to consider the demolition application and they voted to place a stay of demolition

the existing building was eligible for landmark designation you guys know how that played out

it did go through landmarks review it obtained a landmark alteration certificate to uh perform the work that

The options in front of you this evening are to either approve the application. That decision is subject to a city council call-up period.

I will also note that this is a pending landmark, and so the code allows the landmark alteration certificates to be reviewed and approved in the building permit to be applied for.

Finding that the proposal meets the standards for issuance of a landmark alteration certificate in Chapter 9, 1118 Brc.

allowed to be um on a sidewalk it would be consistent with the posos so that brings in micro Mobility

the proposed boundary uh includes just a portion of the site going around the existing building

this application started back in May of 2024 when the owner applied to designate uh the building and a portion of the property as an individual Landmark

staff referred the application to the landmarks board

On January 4, th the landmarks board voted to place a stay of demolition on the application.

I move that we hold a public hearing to consider the initiation of landmark designation

I don't want to be the bad guy that creates call ups and extra work.

When we discuss a call up and have questions about a call up. it is it is not a Mini Site Review.

is this subject to the new 2 person call up, or the prior. one person call up requirement.

What we are doing here tonight we are not requiring the applicant to pursue landmarking.

The building was initially determined to be eligible for local landmark designation, but was ultimately not required to pursue landmark designation.

I also want to encourage you to call up the IRS the iris Transportation Improvement project

it is a landmark alteration certificate to construct a 17 foot by 17t Greenhouse at the property

please call up Iris there are still questions people who oppose a road diet

the applicant applied for designation for individual landmark and the landmarks board held a hearing on July 10th

our callup check-ins are item number three on the agenda

The options in front of you this evening are to either approve the Lac application. That decision is subject to a 16 day city council call up period

The board may disapprove the request, and this is subject to a 45 day call up period, and the owners would need to file a notice of appeal.

It would be a staff level review, and it would be subject to call-ups, so the Board could consider calling it up

The application is a staff level review. subject to call-up by the planning board, unless the parking reduction

So I do need to read each of the call up items in full, correct or not.

The landmarks board then voted to hold an initiation, hearing to consider designating the property over the owner's objection

let's get landmarks approval, and then that'll give us support for the bosa application right?

if designated this property will become Boulder's 216th individual Landmark

would anyone like to call this up all right I don't see anybody there

And so I think Council was expressing that you know, desire for a majority of planning board members to be able to call those up.

They were more comfortable with the increase to 2 planning board members for callups, but they do are of the opinion

maybe we look at having that majority um vote required for a call up for planning board for form by code

planning board has chosen to call up all three of those projects

desire to have just um one planning board member be able to do a call up

any decision of the planning board can be called up by you so that's kind of the process for call-ups

so that brings us um to the first main topic which is the planning board call-ups

This is subject to a sixteen-day city council call-up period.

conditionally approve a landmark alteration certificate to construct a new two-story building

improvements for staff to standardize and increase efficiency for drafting call-up memos has the potential of being a far greater time.

we expect that there would be approximately a 40% reduction in the number of call up memos that you all would see.

we heard a lot about the call ups adding significant time to the process and unpredictability.

asks whether the proposed designation is aligned with the intent of the historic preservation code

I move the Landmarks Board recommend to the City Council that that it designates a property at 904 Mapleton Avenue as a local historic landmark

So Staff's recommendation tonight is the the Landmarks Board recommend to the City Council that it designate the property

It does not meet the significance, criteria for individual landmark designation as is not associated with persons or events

I think it only takes one board member to to call it up.

it would not come back to us for an automatic hearing. But it would be a planning board. Call up item.

if it came back for Site Review as a call up.

There are also many types of projects that do not require a review, including emergency repairs

in the rare case that the landmarks board denies an application, the decision is subject to

There's nothing in the landmark designation that says that the historic district has to be the same

It is considered contributing to the Mapleton Hill historic district, and it's the subject design was approved and received a landmark alteration certificate

Your options tonight are to either approve the landmark, alteration, certificate, application, or approve it with conditions.

item number four on tonight's agenda is our call up check-ins

first commend the applicant that they listened and heard in during the call-up procedure to some concerns.

a site review application once it does come in will require a decision by planning board which will again be subject to call up by city council

determination by historic preservation staff on whether Historic Landmark designation will be required for the Dark Horse

the board voted to schedule a hearing to initiate landmark designation prior to the expiration of the stay

if the landmarks board denies an application, it's subject to call up by the city council

proposing to utilize the same approach as the landmark designation of the Tea House

the benefits of designation include tax credits grant funding possible code variances and staff assistance

I move that the landmarks board schedule a hearing to consider adopting a resolution to initiate the process for landmark designation

you can have options to either initiate the landmark designation process which is a whole different process into it of itself

I think my preference would be to wait for the call up so that we could provide more detail about what we would like dab to look at

a site review application when it comes in will require a decision by planning board which will also be subject to call up by city council

Council was asked to consider the call up of the companion site review application council did not vote to call up the application

I think there are places where use review call ups would be certainly be appropriate.

the question for you is whether you support changing any of the call up procedures in the way we've talked about.

So some of the ideas that we had were to evaluate the call ups, the applications that are currently subject to call up

And so if we wanna make changes, we already go through an lic in that area, the landmark alteration certificate.

So it does add time to the process, and it also provides the guidance or the review through a historic preservation.

I should note that in the rare case where an Lac is denied by the Landmarks Board, that decision is subject to call up by the city council.

So with an approval, the decision is still subject to call up by the city council.

If the landmarks board approves the application. That decision is subject to a 16 day call-up period by city council.

As Staff found that the property met the significance criteria for individual landmark designation.

anybody else any interest in calling this up uh seeing none uh then no seeing none then we can move to um 4C

all right our call up check-ins are item number four on tonight's agenda

We're now going to move to discussion of dispositions call ups and continue.

City Council has 30 days to call up the item for a council hearing to provide additional feedback.

this will be a quasi judicial hearing so you will have your opportunity to take a vote

Finding that the proposal meets the standards for issues of the landmark alteration certificate

This is subject to a 16 day city council call-up period.

That is a public hearing and consideration of a landmark alteration certificate application.

any questions comments or interest in calling this up seeing none can we go to the next one please

It's a public hearing and consideration of a landmark alteration certificate application to construct an 804 square foot accessory building

if the council wanted to call up the decision and review it. If it is cold up, then a hearing would be scheduled within 45 days

conditionally approve a landmark alteration certificate to construct a new accessory building at 7 0 3 11 street

our call up check-ins our checkin is item four on tonight's agenda

Would any fellow member of the board like to ask questions or like to call that item up?

So next step as I understand it should be flowing into call-ups.

this is a routine call up for restaurant in that use

the desire and the assumption that um with greater comfort in the form based code work there would be less discretionary call-ups

why those projects were called up um when we spoke with them last week

So as of now this it's a call up item. So really it's it's a staff level approval

outside of a situation such as that it would be a staff level decision subject to call up

it was like a mandatory call up because there was some something that was requested that was an exception

Why those projects were called up and if changes were made as a result of those call-ups

We have a call up item, final plot to subdivide the property at 2 4 1 5 vine place

This application is subject to potential call-up on or before September, the 20 seventh

when discussing like hardships in and asking for something is financial a hardship, or, you know, for us to consider?

The Board may ask questions, will then hear comments from any member of the public who wishes to speak.

since the July twelfth landmarks board motion to initiate the landmark designation process

any interest in calling this up seeing none we can move on

So if it's subject to call up after this. it's finished, and it doesn't.

And now, though I think it once it gets through the call up period.

in this one seeing none that's it for our call-ups so if we can move

call up check-ins are item number four on tonight's agenda 4A is the extension of call up period and landmark alteration

So city council usually has 16 days to decide whether to review or call up the decision.

we do need to support the retroactive landmark alteration certificate this evening.

may be waived if mutually agreed upon by the board, the applicant, and the owner.

the biggest difference between individual landmark designation and a historic district is the ability to create design guidelines

motion to continue conditionally approve a landmark alteration certificate to rehabilitate building L the former nurse's dormitory

questions or comments or desire to call this up not seeing any hands then looks like we're not interested in calling this one up

So the decision from the Landmarks Board is then sent to the city council. They have an opportunity to call it up within 16 days

Use review for a 7,000 square foot expansion of exterior restaurant use. does anyone have? I? I think I actually read this

to initiate the process for landmark designation of 2119 Mariposa Avenue

and not initiate the process for landmarks and not initiate the process for landmark designation

pulling up the language not to initiate landmark designation. If there was a bigger space of time

each of these structures is proposed for landmark designation and are pending tonight's discussion

Has everyone had the chance to Look at that Call up, and would anyone like to call that up.

Do I usually describe what these are, or is that something that Staff does?

I have no interest in calling this up.

certificate application C5 I see two against the motion passes our second call up

I move that we call up um item 4A The Landmark alteration certificate with respect to the nurse's dormitory

call up and check in the first item is Landmark alteration certificate application

to consider adopting a resolution to initiate the process for landmark designation of 2,119 Mariposa Avenue

designation is not the only way to to save and celebrate old buildings

Consider initiating the landmark designation process. or approve the demolition application to May 25 23.

this is a council call-up option for concept review

our call-ups are item four on tonight's agenda

this is on the call up check-in as item 4B I'm simply here to say please don't call this up

You can approve the application, and that decision is subject to a 16 day call up period by city council.

our call of check-ins are item four on tonight's agenda 4A is our Landmark alteration certificate

the purpose of this item is for the city council to consider whether to call up the above reference application for review and comment

I will be presenting a call up item for 2206 Pearl Street concept plan review

So the landmarks, boards, decisions on L. A. Cs are subject to a council call up as the Lac was approved.

I move that the landmarks board, adopt the staff memorandum, dated March, first 2,023, as the findings of the board and approve a landmark alteration certificate

I personally feel that the Landmarks Design Review Committee just stands by their decision

pushed down to the administrative level with the opportunity for appeal or call up

So now we are moving to a discussion of dispositions and call ups. We have one item tonight to consider, and that is a final plan to subdivide the property

So the criteria, as I mentioned, are found in 9, 1123, of the Boulder Revised Code, and we will start with the eligibility for landmark designation.

yeah I was just going to ask for a call up as well I'm interested in hearing a little bit more about this one

the mecca building that's um was determined to be eligible eligible for local Landmark designation

the third option is to initiate landmark designation. So the process, so far for this property staff, referred the application

I do think that this building and I think Staff does too, rises to the merit of potentially pursuing landmark designation.

The first public hearing is a public hearing and consideration of a motion to adopt a resolution to initiate the process for landmark designation

I feel like pursuit of a local landmark designation is its own specific code section

that the applicant has to in good faith pursue local landmark designation, which is a different process entirely

to call up the item would require its own vote and so doing

instead I look to the rest of the code to be informed about what the proper call-up procedure would be here

should Council choose or a council member choose to request a call up for this item I believe the proper procedure would be

So the process. So far for this property, staff referred the application to the Landmarks design review

The criteria that can be considered are the eligibility of the building for a designation, as an individual landmark

We have several dispositions, and call up in front of us tonight.

We request that planning board, not call up this application and Allow Staff's Approval of the Variance to remain in place.

This is the item on the Callup Agenda and We're requesting that staff decision be allowed to st in place

it would just add that the applicant actually wants us to call it up

our call up and check-ins are item number four on tonight's agenda

is the landmark alteration certificate to restore front porch and replace rear Edition with a new rear Edition

requesting that you do not call up the project because they are pleased with the staff recommendation

we'll move now to a discussion of dispositions and call ups uh we have two or one item uh to deal with as a as a potential call up

any one of which can call up a particular item to the full landmarks board for a public hearing

our call up check-ins 4A is the landmark alteration certificate to install cementius siding on a existing garbage enclosure

the item on your agenda tonight is the landmark alteration certificate that is you know specific to the proposal

This is typically subject to a sixteen Day City Council call up period, but it will need to be extended

it's a public hearing and consideration of the landmark alteration, certificate application to restore front porch

I move that the landmarks board adopt staff memorandum dated november second two thousand and twenty-two

the Mecca building that was recently surveyed and determined to be eligible for landmark designation

I move that the Landmarks Board not initiate the process for landmark designation. As the property is not

This summarized staff's reasons for recommending to not initiate landmark designation but I can pause here

So the board has two options, because the application for demolition was withdrawn.

The Board unanimously moves not to um initiate landmark designation of this property at this point.

so now we move to our call-up check-ins and we have one

negotiations of avoiding call up on gun barrel development of 200 some um housing situations there

if there is agreement between staff and the landmark board then it can be placed on consent um versus being in the call up section

our call-up check-ins tonight are item three item three a is the vacation of a utility drainage and ditch easement

and this is slated for City Council call up. Agenda on July 21

it is dealt with as a landmark and so it would need to go through the landmark alteration certificate process

not expanding the boundary today would mean that technically the area would not be subject to landmark alteration certificate review

4c our lambac landmark alteration certificate to construct a wall at the east property line of 841 spruce street a contributing property in the mapleton hill historic district

we're not calling it up we are referring it to tab

item 4c is a landmark alteration certificate to construct a rear two-story addition

whether or not they wanted to call up developments with regard to you know other things

extend the validity period of the landmark alteration certificate and the demolition permits

extending the expiration date of a landmark alteration certificate and historic preservation demolition approval

4b is the landmark alteration certificate to modify exterior building adding a front porch

that would be under item four of tonight's agenda for a is our landmark alteration certificate to construct a two car garage

they do require administrative approval for demo and they do require landmark alteration certificates

as with every landmark designation the city council's role here is to determine whether the proposed designation conforms

a landmark alteration certificate application was submitted for review and this solution to constructing a two-story addition

while we can get a landmark alteration certificate to make to make changes to the parking

next we have item 4B which is also a callup check-in for a callup consideration

we have item under item four 4A is the callup consider consideration for the landmark alteration certificate to

landmarks in particular um there's that 14-day um period for call-ups

it was surveyed by architectural historians in 198 88 and found at that time to be eligible for landmark designation

this is a site review uh call up so unlike at the concept plans there's not really an opportunity

landmarks DRC afterwards um reviewed um a small um interstitial space between the new um addition

they're intending to submit a new Landmark alteration certificate application um for review that includes replacement of the windows

item four a is the call up consideration for the landmark alteration certificate for window replacement

should you give us your recommendation we would go to city council in early summer of next year, with their option to call up the project

Should you make that recommendation we will place the recommended design on the city council's agenda for a potential call up

it was recently surveyed and determined to be eligible for a local Landmark designation

our callup checkin 5A is the callup consideration for the landmark alteration certificate for construction of additions

we look at Landmark designations in terms of its historic environmental and Architectural

this Landmark designation application started about a year ago in October 2020 when the landmark designation application was submitted

as well as counsel on call up on November 30 to understand what the physical

as long as council can hear back from tab prior to the november 30th call-up

concluded that the building is eligible like i said for local landmark designation

was recently surveyed and determined to be eligible for a local landmark designation

the call up for 2504 spruce has been moved to september 28th so we got your input

urge you to call up the 2504 spruce street project for council review

we are tonight going to remove item 4b which is a call-up consideration for 2504 spruce street

let me double check i haven't heard any desire to call it up does anyone desire to call this project up

is on track to go to the landmarks board at the october 6th um meeting dates which would then go to council

next on our agenda we have our call up and check-in items under number four on this agenda

we can either have a motion or questions on the call up item I'm not seeing question so I will invite a motion

our next item on this agenda is our call up checkins item 4A thank you and I would just turn

that item is a call up item for a combined site and use review application

please call up this proposed development thank you so much

this one came in through the annexation Pro um process and celebrates one of um Boulder longtime local businesses

is the landmark alteration certificate consideration of a proposal to construct a 338 sqt accessory building

one of the call-ups tonight is the diagonal Plaza

all right next on our agenda we have our call up check-ins

we probably won't take an action tonight to call it up but what that non-action is

next on our agenda we have our call up check second item which is item 4A call up item for site review and use

was this a 70 or unanimous planning board decision yes it was a unanimous planning board decision

I think we've been looking at this sign and and this potential project for just about the entire five years that that I've been on Council

i will be speaking about the call up of the planning board's approval of the conversion of the marpa house

first we have the call up item for the non-conforming use review for the historic restoration and conversion

the landmarks board saw this um last month in February and then it went to First reading

which is a second reading and a motion to adopt ordinance 8446 designating the property at 2230 20th Street as an individual Landmark

writing the landmark designation criteria and it checks nearly every box it's historically significant

invoke a n ND of five to call up the lease review it and revise it or cancel it

do your duty call up the lease to make changes that do not discriminate against better Partners

I will turn to council and see does anyone want to call up um for

callup consideration Landmark alteration certificate for construction of an inground pool at 643 Mapleton Avenue

the question before us is do we want to call up this concept plan so I'll open the floor

your call up tonight your call up is 1820 15th Street or the grace Commons Church

but there's not the formal mechanism of requiring like a landmark alteration certificate for interior work

to adopt ordinance 8431 designating the building and a portion of the property at 1770 13th Street as an individual Landmark

tonight's call up is the landmark alteration certificate for 1346

I am concerned with uh item 3E The Landmark designation for the tea house

now we're on to your call up tonight and it's 406 Pearl Street the demo and reconstruction

if designated this would be our 202nd individual Landmark the process is pretty straightforward

whether the subject property meets the criteria for landmark designation

thank you Council for your call up this evening and hearing us

i did want to just further comment on both the community gardens and the landmarking

So Next on the agenda is your call up items. The first one is 5691 steel folder road content when review.

We encourage council to call up our concept plan so we can get your feedback

so then I have next on my script the call up check in is that right

we need a motion to suspend the council rules and procedure to allow us to vote on call-ups

next we have the call up check-in so um

our city approval bodies approve the land use changes in area one and area two with a callup potential to our County Commissioners

next is call up checkin um I don't believe we have any call up items tonight

okay next on the agenda is your first call up it's a landmark alteration certificate for 734 maxwell avenue

ON APRIL TWENTY FIRST OF JUST A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO A LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE WAS ISSUED FOR THE PROJECT.

SO IN FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR A LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE WAS SUBMITTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER

THE LANDMARKS BOARD PASSED A RESOLUTION INITIATING LANDMARK DESIGNATION WHICH IS A STEP THAT'S REQUIRED

IS A LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW GARAGE ON THE PROPERTY

THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA ARE MATTERS OF THE MEMBERS OF COUNCIL THERE TO CALL UP

the property owner submitted the application in October of 2019 and on November 6 the Landmarks Board voted four to zero

where that fits in visa Vee the council call up well it's done a variety of ways for a variety of projects

Council at its discretion may call up the concept plan for additional public input

THAT'S PART OF WHAT THE LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE IS THAT IT IS BEFORE YOU TONIGHT

THEY WERE ALREADY GOING TO BE DOING A LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE FOR THAT RELOCATION

ONE OF THE CALL UPS BEFORE YOU IS A LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE FOR THREE ELEVEN MAPLES

staff does recommend and the landmarks board too recommends that the um city council designate this property

second reading of ordinance 8367 designating 2326 goth Street as an individual Landmark

a landmark designation of 2326 gos Street and then an update Transportation design standards first

we designate or bring to you to designate new landmarks in historic districts

over the course of the 45 years we've designated 170 197 individual landmarks 10 historic districts

you have one call up this evening a youth review for 954 North Street

THERE'S A CALL UP WE DIDN'T CALL IT OUT EARLIER

ACTUALLY STARTED OUT AS A NON CONSENSUAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION

AND MAYBE EVEN EXPLAIN THE CALL OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONSENT AND CALL UP

OKAY LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE FROM NINETEEN HUNDRED CABIN IN THE BAY OF QUESTIONS WANT TO DISCUSS WHAT TO CALL UP

LANDMARK ALTERATION CERTIFICATE FOR A FORTY FIVE PINE ST

THOSE OF THE THINGS THAT YOU GET INTEGRATED INTO THE LANDMARK ORDINANCE ITSELF

you have to call up considerations tonight the first one is a landmark alteration certificate for 920 Mapleton Avenue

TYPICALLY IT'S SOMETHING THAT GROWS OUT OF THE LANDMARKS FOR REVIEW PROCESS

COULD POTENTIALLY BE ELIGIBLE FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF THE OTHER THINGS I WANTED TO KNOW IS THAT THE LANDMARKS BOARD IS PLANNING TO TALK ABOUT THIS

IN WHICH CASE IT WOULD BE SUBJECT TO CALL UP BY THE PLANNING BOARD BY ANY CITIZEN OR ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING BOARD

the city council designate the following properties as local historic landmarks with boundaries as described

the city council may approve the designations modify and approve or deny these designations

that's the four landmark designations so if you want to speak to those sign up separately over there

so the fact that we did not call it up means that we won't be taking it on tonight

a landmark alteration certificate for 835 Pine Street and the

THAT STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT THE BUILDING IS SO WORTHY OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION

WE HAD ALSO INTENDED TO MEET WITH THEM PRIOR TO THIS EVENING BUT WE POSTPONED THAT BECAUSE OF THE CALL UP

WE ACTUALLY HAD A MEETING SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CALL UP DISCUSSION

WE PLAN TO COME TONIGHT TO ADDRESS COMMENTS RAISED OUT WHEN IT WAS DECIDED TO DO WITH CALL UPS.

COUNCIL VOTED TO CALL UP THE PROPOSAL FOR DISCUSSION BACK IN JUNE.

I DON'T FEEL A NEED TO CALL UP ANYBODY

A FINAL CALL UP IS REGARDING THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM

ANY MORE DISCUSSION ON THIS FROM ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF CALLING IT

GET A QUICK STRAW POLL TO SEE IF THAT THERE'S A MAJORITY THAT WANTS TO DO A CALL UP

YOU HAVE FIVE CALL UPS BEFORE YOU TONIGHT CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW FOR PONDEROSA

in reading the call-up report or whatever the with the landmarks board did I guess I'm wondering if these conditions

the next item on our agenda is the call up check in tonight we have 1102 Pearl Street for landmarks alteration certificate