Map / Landmarks Board / ← 2025-11-05 · 2026-01-07 →
Landmarks Board · regular
12-3-25 Landmarks Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed28 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personto give variances and allowances or incentives to people who might want to put these properties as ADUs in their backyard
with the new form-based code, which is outrageous. Not even the person that set the whole thing up with the East Boulder Sub-Community Plan
On October 8th, the Landmarks Design Review Committee referred the applications to the full Landmarks Board for review
This area is the ancestral homelands and unceded territory of Indigenous peoples
Moving again to the east, along the row of houses, the next house is 990 Arapahoe Avenue.
the stay of demolition will threaten access to much-needed, high-quality, affordable housing for low-income seniors.
The Presbyterian Manor has owned these houses for some time, and have maintained them
we don't believe that the buildings meet the criteria for landmark designation.
with mature trees that would not only be cost prohibitive to build on, would also endanger, kind of, the urban forestry of the city of Boulder
almost the entire site is subject to FEMA regulatory floodplain, including floodplain Zone AE
for the low-income housing tax credit development, which would be considered burdensome by the LIHTC funders
as part of the zoning for affordable housing zoning changes, the R2 zoning on this site has been subject to a floor area ratio maximum.
It would require full ADA upgrades, which would basically involve reconstruction of the entire interior
The only zone in the city that actually kind of got downzoned as a result of it was RH2, which is where this is.
So, we have two that are Type A ADA accessible, and the remainder are Type B ADA accessible.
The notion that this is a trade-off between 4 market rate units versus 60 affordable units is a red herring.
to consider a solution that incorporates shared community benefits of affordable housing, historic preservation, and environmentalism.
The demolition of these four buildings would destroy their embodied energy, deplete natural resources, and hurt the carbon footprint of Boulder.
balancing other community values of historic preservation energy efficiency, carbon neutrality, keeping the pedestrian scale
find a way for two deeply held community values, affordable housing, and historic preservation, to work together in tandem
Have no hesitation to promote the building, the demolition of these houses.
the fact that it's senior housing, so you can't have senior housing, you can't have apartments in the floodplain
And if you were to make them common area, then they would, need to be fully ADA accessible.
So the integration of them, it's not physically feasible, given the floodplain constraints that we have.
I do believe 976 Arapaho Avenue is eligible for individual landmark designation, so for this item
And part of that this year is a board and commissions open house
and then we'll invite everybody, so if you can make it, or if you just want to stop by
Like, the site review process, like, that's an issue, okay?