Map / Planning Board / ← 2024-01-16 · 2024-02-06 →
Planning Board · regular
1-23-24 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed27 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personthere would be 4,000 affordable units available per year if we went to the maximum of 40 per development
why don't we have more affordable housing in boulder?
with inclusionary housing and not meeting the jobs, housing, imbalance and or having ex, you know, having impact fees on the developers
with inclusionary housing and not meeting the jobs, housing, imbalance and or having ex, you know, having impact fees on the developers
It implores me more than ever for you to say that we need to do impact fees. We need to get a reasonable 140%.
We need to get a reasonable 140%. Or more inclusionary housing.
We had the accessory dwelling unit update which turned it into a one step process and created a much simpler approval process.
So we went through the Site Review criteria which made things more predictable and scriptive.
We also had zoning for affordable housing which provided flexibility for more housing types.
We also had zoning for affordable housing which provided flexibility for more housing types.
So some of the ideas that we had were to evaluate the call ups, the applications that are currently subject to call up
the question for you is whether you support changing any of the call up procedures in the way we've talked about.
I know for sure that the floodplain permit was just approved exactly how it was originally presented.
That's not the criteria and a form based code. The emphasis is more on the building
Laura just quickly on that subject of the Wetland and floodplain callups. Does the Water Advisory Board have any role in that.
I still certainly don't completely understand the wetland and floodplain process
I think there are places where use review call ups would be certainly be appropriate.
I think, for form based code. We created city manager discretion on whether or not to require a development agreement
And then there's built in institutionalized things. And that's what we're talking about today.
But what does that have to do with parking necessitates a higher parking requirement?
Last one this is public art. So this is something that's been brought up.
if we're talking about a 10 foot setback for the art then, and you want to just paint a mural on your fence.
meet the Boulder Valley Comp plan landings start with start with a given rather than everything is off the table.
consistency with the Boulder Valley comprehensive plan and other ordinances, goals, policies, and plans, including without limitations, sub community plans and sub area plans.
Consistency with the the bullet comp plan and the land use map is a requirement.
One of the first weeks I was here we got a mural proposal, and it had things on it that represented food
it's inconsistent with the North Boulder Subcommittee plan, but it's a really compelling idea.