Map / Landmarks Board / ← 2025-02-05 · 2025-04-02 →
Landmarks Board · regular
3-12-25 Landmarks Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed13 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personFinally, or 1, 2 more items is the family friendly zoning. I reached out to the building department
they're doing impact fees for demolitions, and it's totally inadequate.
demolition impact fee is $113 per square foot, which is still nothing, and boulders doing $15 a square foot.
I'm furious. About 1015 juniper that was so unacceptable that was affordable housing
So I think the demolitions should be much higher. The impact fee than.
Last month the Board voted to schedule this hearing, to initiate, to consider initiating landmark designation
If the proposed designation is consistent with the goals and policies of the Boulder Valley comprehensive plan, and if the proposed designation would generally be in the public interest.
The next consideration is whether the building needs protection provided through designation.
Comprehensive plan policy. 2.2 7 of the Comp. Plan states that the city and county will identify, evaluate, and protect
You may initiate designation. You can not initiate landmark designation, or you can approve the demolition application.
they're putting high rises and student housing everywhere in town, rented by the bedroom.
and in balance is not consistent with the goals and policies of section 227 of the Boulder Valley.
I think it's a really good example of new construction in a historic district, and how to add an adu in a historic context.