Map / Planning Board / ← 2025-02-18 · 2025-03-04 →
Planning Board · regular
2-25-25 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed30 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personone of the caterpillars that's demoing Gaza, and in boulder it's gonna be demoed
the project update on access management and parking strategy amps, code and policy enhancement
We also looked into shared parking. The State created a bunch of best practices, and we are looking into better ways to support shared parking.
there's been a lot more adoption of like cargo bikes and e-bikes and things like that
The energy conservation code is actually where the Ev charging requirements live.
collaborating with the Boulder Valley School district to formalize a park and walk zone around elementary schools.
our energy conservation code now seems to be numerically objective in terms of ev charging requirements
the energy conservation code already outlines the numbers that likely doesn't need to be in the land use code
The the form-based code itself doesn't have parking standards.
the Transit Oriented Communities Bill was passed by the State last year.
we can't require site review for those 5 acre plus projects simply based on the fact that it is a large development
If we eliminate minimum parking requirements? Yes, okay, that would be the case.
this could be a good topic to discuss during the comprehensive plan process
if we were going to get some feedback on what the better use of land might be in the comprehensive plan
The adu ordinance was just passed by council.
to either partially or or fully exempt. 100% affordable housing
to use the Tdm plan ordinance to provide an ongoing contribution towards meeting city and climate goals
we would design an initial Tdm plan based on those annual financial guaranteed levels
We're looking at an annual monitoring process. We have an established trip generation target
Yes, it could be used as part of form-based code.
Again, form-based codes are still subject to call up by the planning board.
if the use changes significantly and the trip generation changes significantly, then I think we would want to require that that Tdm plan be amended.
How does it work for a bunch of unrelated people living together in a household right?
parents that the rules around in the Npps around schools are not flexible enough for their needs
I can't speak for Bvsd. We are planning. We are attempting to connect with them on on this.
as is written in the code is, does not address many of the issues that make e-bikes a real tool to reduce single vehicle traffic movements
I'm especially concerned with the affordable housing component of it, the 100% affordable housing.
I know we talked about maybe it belongs in the Boulder Valley comp plan process.
we've seen our property taxes get raised by 30 or 40% over the decade
It's an affordable housing. I forgot the actual like 0 homestead or something. It's the nexus study.