Map / Planning Board / ← 2023-05-16 · 2023-06-20 →
Planning Board · regular
6-6-23 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed28 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personthe public hearing matter is the energy code update. I'm sorry the 2,024 city of Boulder Energy Conservation Code Development Project
South Boulder Rec Center. You know the rec centers needing infrastructure. Let the developer pay.
Use review for a 7,000 square foot expansion of exterior restaurant use. does anyone have? I? I think I actually read this
a parking deferral gives the city the ability to require them to build the deferred parking at any time.
The patio is to the west of the building, and the building itself blocks the light and no, and some noise
the city of Boulder has a carbon reduction emission or carbon emissions, reduction of 70. We're targeting by 2,030
the first iteration of our energy code here in Boulder the 2,017 version was really based more back on an earlier version of an ashtray standard
The last piece here that I wanted to to really touch on that really brings everything. Full circle is just this idea of carbon reduction.
you talked about electric bike charging a and I'm curious. Just again. I'm ignorant here my personal experience with electric bikes
there is opportunity to leverage federal, state and local investment to advance equity priorities without sacrificing building performance.
with regards to affordable housing and multi family, I think that's something that we could look at and definitely, we'll dig into
how will this, once it's adopted. the integrated into our building code. our site review process, our Tpm plans.
It begs the question, why, look at parking requirements, that your your suggested parking requirements and electrification requirements
the percentage requirements for electric construction above which developers would just go ahead and go all electric.
the urban Heat Island effect has a huge impact on electricity or energy use. Because if you if you don't have shade
such as Alpine balsam and taking all the trade offs of just you know the electrical has to be redone there
supporting a fund very similar to our inclusionary Housing fund that would support the addition of rip top solar
if this is going to be part of or integrated or inform a developer's Tdm plans. it. It needs to. It needs to be more thoroughly addressed
It's not about traffic and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles. It's not about how changing land use would change greenhouse gas emissions.
one of the incentives that the landmarks board can grant is that a building that is landmarks does not have to meet the energy code
and also not discourage or make it less. you know, lower the volume of affordable housing that we can afford to provide with the same money.
whether that is giving them a break like we do for historic preservation properties, or if it is increasing
or if you want to have, you know, private out, more heaters. the patio heaters, or something that it seems like something that we should definitely be discouraged
But I am aware of nothing outside of the the historic preservation code. The restricts pink color.
quick update on the airport as your liaison. We do have Our third airport community working group meeting will happen tomorrow
draft scenarios, and we'll get to comment on them at that stage. And then after that there will be, I believe, another round
planning board does kind of operate outside of the norm when it comes to that boards and commissions. so we're kind of working on actually developing
I had asked at a previous meeting. If there's any information that Staff can provide around the height limitation. That was approved by voters