Map / Planning Board / ← 2024-11-12 · 2024-12-03 →
Planning Board · regular
11-19-24 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed39 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personI think it's I think it's titled family-friendly, vibrant, vibrant neighborhoods.
but not family, friendly, vibrant neighborhoods, because you'll have the opportunity later.
So I want to talk about 777 Broadway, and about the insatiable growth of boulder
I'm going to start at the top and go to the bottom holiday neighborhood area 3 Planning Reserve J.
Western resource advocates to be 30 more residential units, 777 Broadway, going from 40 to 222 rent by the bedrooms.
to consider a motion to find that there is an interest in considering a service area expansion into the area
as part of the 2025 major update to the Boulder Valley comprehensive plan following the public
2 utilities programs beyond the current 6 year cip that might be affected by reprioritization due to the planning reserve
So in the study it talked about under moderate to severe future climate projections
we analyzed the possible amount of growth within the area against a number of different climate scenarios
the outcomes of that are less about the availability of of water, as it relates to an absolute number
there is interest in considering a service area expansion into the area. 3. Planning reserve
to move forward with this annexation, and to increase density is to do our community a grave disservice
if the Bvcp process, the process outlined in the Bvcp were different
Tonight we're going to talk about the family friendly, vibrant Neighborhoods Project.
to amend review procedures and use standards to reduce regulatory requirements for certain residential developments
Try to get more affordable housing, incentivize affordable housing.
adding more housing allows for more cash. In lieu. Going into the affordable Housing Fund
we should only be allowing deed, restricted, permanently affordable housing units rather than just adding housing
Everything that we're proposing in the ordinance is has to be found consistent with the Current Boulder Valley comprehensive plan
there was also a concern about the parking requirements in the zone which are based on bedrooms
Board members did want to hear whether boulder housing partners would be open to this
it could be a time savings that lowers some of the risk for Bhp, so they've indicated support of it
there are no changes to any parking off street parking requirements in any of the zones
Does this bring us in line with the adu changes with the State?
by building something in that incentivizes the adaptive reuse of eligible buildings and existing stock
there's been historic buildings on properties in the county that we're annexing to the city
It doesn't jump to. You must landmark your building in order to get this increased density.
So we're providing many, many avenues of how to add additional density while balancing and and incentivizing the preservation
One is the landmark designation process and owner consent versus opposition
wondering about a consultation with the climate initiative regarding reduction of open space
Why aren't we incentivizing those by allowing adus to be condominiumized.
the proponent of allowing duplexes versus an adu is that you have more flexibility on the size
Just going back to the demolition of buildings that are potentially eligible for historic preservation.
This is what we are proposing for affordable 100% affordable housing projects that would be exempted from Site Review.
It was kind of a sister building at 777 Broadway, and that one was demoed last week approved for Demo
amending chapters, 9. Dash, 2 review processes, 9, dash, 6, use standards and 9 dash, 8 intensity standards
this was a huge conversation that we had in the East Boulder subcommunity plan update
to amend review procedures and use standards to reduce regulatory requirements for certain residential developments