Map / City Council / ← 2023-04-13 · 2023-04-27 →
City Council · regular
Boulder City Council Meeting 4-20-23
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed41 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personour community has a legacy of adaptive leadership in taking a holistic approach to climate action
join the city's efforts to slow climate change and build a more resilient and Equitable community
water resources are under strain in Colorado the Colorado River is already overdrafted
SB 23213 will put additional strain on depleting Water Resources
we're extremely concerned that the recommendation of the special counsel undermines the independence of the pop
started locally on occupancy adus and middle housing the housing crisis requires all hands on deck
this is on the call up check-in as item 4B I'm simply here to say please don't call this up
I'm a no on hb23 I want to see more housing but with guarantees of affordability
adus doesn't really matter so much because they aren't going to get built all that much because they're expensive
especially for University Hill you know this land liberalization has a major effect on Boulder
for several months now have been I've seen the purpose of the panel be at best ignored
there are proven ways to get more affordable housing we need to double down on those policies
I expect the police oversight panel to hold the police accountable therefore I expect panel members
asking the governor to override our Municipal Authority is an abdication of council's responsibilities
our call-ups are item four on tonight's agenda
include housing retail light industrial and art studio space Community Green Space and a new home for the boulder Museum of Contemporary Art
this is a council call-up option for concept review
in terms of the Boulder Valley comp plan land use designation there are actually three designations
it is located within the boundaries of the North Boulder sub-community plan and the land use designated
the modifications to the land use code that they're requesting that can be requested through site review include
key issue 2 was considering Boulder Valley comp plan and nobo plan goals and policies
the board generally did not feel that updating the youth standards in the land use code to accommodate a single project was appropriate
supported a targeted update to the North Boulder Southern community plan
if the Nobel plan in bbcp designations were updated they would likely support a rezoning
really in line with what I think was really some of that core intention 20 some years ago with the North Boulder sub community plan
we have started fundraising the total integrated Capital campaign right now is somewhere around 25 million dollars
then in November of 2019 there was a ballot initiative to fund the um to create a funding mechanism for the pilot program that was approved by voters
this is a quite a unique and Innovative approach to middle-income housing
that's a lot of affordable housing that we will be foregoing for these subsidies
when you look at the leverage that BHP uses in in developing housing that's a lot of housing
are we looking to the general fund to to pay that or are we going to bond it
Senate Bill 23 213 was introduced in the Senate on March 22nd
development may be limited because of water infrastructure challenges water supply water infrastructure
it also prohibits prohibits additional off-street parking requirements and prohibits owner occupancy requirements
the bill as introduced would allow adus within to be built as a use by right and existing residential areas
do we have the 30 between the key Carters and the let's say the East Boulder sub-community plan
in my mind what I Envision is the East Boulder sub community plan some of the areas along North Broadway
in places such as the one she mentioned East Boulder
if familial status is removed as a basis for occupancy limits then you cannot have an occupancy limit
if we get the occupancy limits changed as asked then we will support
are they saying they would would support the bill only if there was no reference to occupancy limit