Map / Landmarks Board / ← 2023-03-01 · 2023-05-03 →
Landmarks Board · regular
4-12-23 Landmarks Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed13 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a persontalk a bit about some of the flood constraints Number one, probably some of the constraints, number one being the flood and the flood plane
which is essentially having residential within the flood plane and not lifted above the base flood elevation
to help coordinate this historic district exploration with the phase 2 Parks planning effort
exploration of a civic area historic district since the city Council's meeting last June
the exploration will be integrated into the reimagining civic area east Phase 2, which is starting this year
if it's a historic district, we would then look at the treatment and management recommendations which are a Kent to design guidelines
Council direct staff to ensure that the landmarks, board, and parts, and Wreck advisory board are both appropriately engaged in the Park design process
to direct planning and development services to prioritize preparation of an application to designate a larger civic area, historic district in 2,023
You can approve the application, and that decision is subject to a 16 day call up period by city council.
So I wanted to start with the definitions of primary, secondary, and tertiary elevation, because the guidelines put an emphasis on that.
In order to meet the accessibility requirements. The sales are currently at 50 inches, and you need to drop them to 30 inches
but in terms of it, meeting the design guidelines, I think the guidelines specifically say that it's not appropriate to add another story
I am sensitive to the accessibility piece, and and I think i'd like to dig into that a bit more later