Map / Landmarks Board / ← 2023-02-01 · 2023-04-12 →
Landmarks Board · regular
3-1-23 Landmarks Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed24 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personBut so we now both have this 1920 for landscape plan, and we've got the plant list that goes with it.
I personally feel that the Landmarks Design Review Committee just stands by their decision
the city is covering the cost in this case, because it's a second opinion, and we have a pretty small operating budget.
But you know our our budget is pretty limited for the historic preservation.
so the proposal in front of you all tonight is to install a 10 foot 8 foot tall memorial sculpture
so going into the analysis against the design guidelines, i'll just read through the guidelines for the artwork
The scale of the sculpture is appropriate in relation to the monolithic monolithic massing of the boulder Masonic lodge
And so he approached me to say. i'd love to give this to the museum.
but not flowers that were going to compost, and a group of artists worked with the city of Boulder to gather those organic materials separately
It appears to me that that is an Ada accessible path.
One thing that I would request is that you confirm that the path there to the circular place where the sculpture is accessible
I move that the landmarks board, adopt the staff memorandum, dated March, first 2,023, as the findings of the board and approve a landmark alteration certificate
So the landmarks, boards, decisions on L. A. Cs are subject to a council call up as the Lac was approved.
Additionally, Staff found that the wood windows would likely meet the city's energy, regulation and requirements.
and will not comply with sections, 2 and 3.3 of the general design guidelines in Section 9, 1118 B.
and is generally inconsistent with the general design guidelines and the Mapleton Hill Historic District guidelines.
we're working on several projects of middle income housing and boulder.
affordable housing, middle income, no 300 square feet for 1,700 to $2,600 a month, without a parking space
They are bringing the bucks in big time in the name of affordable middle income housing.
However, we do not think 1444 false Folsom Street meets those standards.
It was constructed to serve the harvest house, hotel, and notably its initial construction, was level with Folsom Street.
but basically all of the lower level units were in water, and the 100 year. Flood plane elevations
how much of the structural damage that this did this building incur as a result of being in the flood plan.
So you know I've been involved in enough subdivisions throughout my career to know that you can't build in a flood plane.