Map / Planning Board / ← 2024-12-17 · 2025-01-21 →
Planning Board · regular
1-7-25 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed45 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personWhat about the airport? What about the planning reserve?
It's like Israel. It's suicidal. What they're doing is genocide.
actually the 1st homeless person he'd seen at the Coffee House.
Does anyone have any comments, or would like to consider calling this item up.
Section J of the subdivision agreement speaks to the to stormwater conveyance, stormwater being conveyed in the historic manner.
maps to reflect the new flood command zone that has been updated by Fema, and with that
I think that was part of the annexation that was negotiated back in the mid 2 thousands
I wouldn't assume that they're going to apply before Thursday night, when family friendly, vibrant neighborhoods goes before council.
Family, friendly, vibrant neighborhoods and State laws come into effect.
the family friendly vibrant housing isn't necessarily an up zoning. It's just kind of new standards for existing zoning districts
I'm providing some kind of big picture context for best practices around use of a land acknowledgement
It's a living document. We began the development of our land acknowledgement in 2,021.
We then put together a draft, and had more than 3 rounds of revisions back and forth with those tribal representatives
it was very important to us that we had the names of the tribes in the languages that they speak.
We have a invite list currently of 16 tribal nations that you can see here.
Where we heard from tribal representatives that land acknowledgements have bordered on offensive at times.
In terms of the Bvcp. This lot is designated light industrial. It allows for light industrial uses
The property is in the East Boulder subcommunity plan that was adopted in October 2022.
if the proposed concept plan is compatible with the goals, objectives, and recommendations of the Bvcp.
Staff recommended that the applicant carefully consider Ada accessibility and designing with the contours of the land
So for next steps following tonight's concept plan, review, hearing city council might vote to call up the item
I don't believe we show anything on our Tmp at this time that would create a new connection there.
And if at some point in the future the San Lacero property is annexed to the city.
The transportation Master Plan shows that the Missing Link is proposed on 3 different lots.
I believe this is a plan connection that we're showing on the Tmp but it wouldn't come into play with this subject proposal
with an intent to talk to the owner about, you know, potentially encouraging an annexation.
Last question is, just doing a little Google map search. I couldn't find any cafe restaurant type of establishment anywhere along Airport Boulevard.
For the shared parking agreement. What happens to it. Should it be approved if the North lot was developed
mobility piece, the the micro modes, the scooters, the E-bikes skating, whatever it is.
So Airport Boulevard is obviously the back door. But what do we do to help mitigate the use of that
As far as the sub community plan goes. You can see where we sit in the picture of East Boulder here.
But it's also talking about promoting efficient use of parking through different, unbundled, paid, flexible, shared, use different types
what is the logic behind your placing, parking between buildings one and 2 is that to meet minimum parking requirements?
we're also trying to navigate, you know, having a you know, lime scooter area for that last mile connectivity
And then we also have an Ada access, you know on the you know West Side.
the Comp plan is very, very explicit in what they, what kind of specific things you have to do within the Comp plan
Number one is Gaza, the West bank, East Jerusalem a minor, you know.
about fulfilling the subjective Tdm requirements of our code.
for Ada access, you have to go all the way to the West side and then back down.
I really urge the applicant team to take the Tdm requirement seriously.
the code requirement is that a transportation demand management plan will be complied with.
we are on the cusp of creating code that mandates housing within the East Boulder sub community plan
within the same building as potentially life sciences, buildings, or other industrial uses.
the civic center is an interesting one to discuss for a moment
So say, during a meeting, you're gonna call up an item.