Map / Planning Board / ← 2022-11-29 · 2022-12-20 →
Planning Board · regular
12-6-22 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed38 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personThis is the item on the Callup Agenda and We're requesting that staff decision be allowed to st in place
the work to remove the property from the 100 Year Flood plan plane has already been completed
We request that planning board, not call up this application and Allow Staff's Approval of the Variance to remain in place.
without the Variance will incur significant additional cost to comply with floodplain Regulations only to have
We have several dispositions, and call up in front of us tonight.
the percent of Affordable Housing community benefit will be finalized through annexation
at the planning reserve lately ahead of the next major update
some except the existing and proposed transportation connections
there is a proposed Multi-use, Path That's identified through the Green Line, through the Transportation Master Plan
require a provision of a certain percentage of affordable housing
They would require an annexation initial zoning of Dvc. Land Use Map Change in the Site Review
the Site as indicated on the Transportation Master Plan
this proposal would provide a variety of Housing Types. It would provide Ada accessible units.
I thought it was area 3. I might be mistaken I Defer to
area 3 contains both the planning Reserve and also some areas that are designated
the city has different categories of affordable housing. Low income
the density is very much a function of what the site can support for affordable housing
it's for sale family-friendly, middle Income housing all Of which we have goals for
when in what year did we establish our middle income housing goal
Regarding this density bonuses that you can request and it requires the applicant to go through site review
we kind of take inclusionary housing as a starting point
I have many discussions with the City's Inclusionary Housing Staff
proposed then accessible units associated with the middle Income Component
I really appreciate that you called out that this development would include 2 of those Van Accessible Units
the tree lawn separating pedestrians from the street trees
Are you proposing private streets solely to fulfill the Parking
the Inclusionary Housing Staff feel like anything we can do
the possibility of changing Zoning so that more affordable units can Be built on site is what we need to do
no rezoning of the property and annex session should be allowed prior to
my perception is that this does not agree at present with the boulder Valley
how is this Project respecting the land in the Climate
the Climate factors will significantly change the quality of this plan
that is how the proposal uses the streets
I appreciate Staff's focus on Tdm and the Traffic Impact Study
they use the street parking to make their parking requirements
encourage people to use the public transit that is available when you have a free ecopas
if you read the comp plan right you could design any kind of city you want out of that Comp plan
I have no problem with changing the use