Map / City Council / ← 2021-02-23 · 2021-03-16 →
City Council · regular
Boulder City Council Meeting 3-2-21
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed41 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personthe Boulder City Council approved the appointment of the first first nine members of Boulder's new civilian all civilian police oversight panel
the police oversight held its first meeting on February 11th 2021 and their work is now actively underway
it specifically states that Boulder County is involved in development of plans that affect land in area 2 or area 3
I thought the Boulder Valley comp plan was a jointly adopted plan for both the county and the city of Boulder
they don't feel safe they aren't safe the perpetrators at artmart have been arrested and released multiple times
area businesses are closing at an alarming rate I've heard from many Boulder residents they no longer will shop downtown because of safety concerns
the city council must address the crime and Public Safety in our community now
I ask that you please hear us and not allow high density student housing to be developed and built in our neighborhood
Red Cross has clearly stated that the devastation of climate change far exceeds the devastation of Co
this presentation provides a path to fast carbon reduction using solar next slide rooftop solar may not be the absolute cheapest path
any one of these Alternatives could have us at 100% Renewables today it'll be a mix of solutions that get us to our goals fast
the errors allowing a 48 student apartment in this neighborhood change the character of the neighborhood
I'd like to thank the no eviction without representation ballot initiative folks
at the recent January 19th meeting a few members on Council that opposed the camping ban suggested
we have an addiction and a violent crime problem among a small subset of the unhoused which our unfortunately our housing first policies don't address
having um electric scooters on on paths and things
whoever the new subcommittee members are I just wanted to flag that
annexation terms or flood mitigation design will not be part of the purpose
writing the landmark designation criteria and it checks nearly every box it's historically significant
the property was annexed together with 96 arapo which will be coming in front of you
in 2017 both 90 and 96 arapo property adjacent to the east were successfully annexed into the city
the entire development they're all um for sale permanently affordable units
we have um different levels established and that was part of the annexation uh agreement
which is a second reading and a motion to adopt ordinance 8446 designating the property at 2230 20th Street as an individual Landmark
the landmarks board saw this um last month in February and then it went to First reading
the program should be more weighted towards affordable housing nevertheless most of the council agreed
so the Alpine Balsam area was added as well as the rh3 zoning districts
right now we have the commercial linkage fee which goes to affordable housing obviously but this would be new territory
is the community benefit structure supposed to be in lie of the entire linkage fee for a project
remove the reference the first Criterion which is a reference to the Boulder Valley comprehensive plan
one of the things we keep hearing from the community is is obviously through the site review process is making this more predictable
moving over to a question about the affordable commercial space
replacing the commercial linkage fee um with either inl or um with uh affordable commercial
talking about replacing the additional commercial linkage fee so we're talking about
if you have you you know small businesses or uh businesses that need the help in the same building
one of the advantages of the cash andl and affordable housing is that it is then leveraged to get more affordable housing
you could reference the comp plan policies um to be interpreted at site plan review that have not yet made their way into code
the third question of how many of these board and commission meetings you've attended takes about two seconds to answer
I would suggest that we only ask that question if they were televised so that we avoid the gotcha Point
one of the things that we talk about with boards and commissions is how we have not done a good job of
anybody who's working for CU considering CU souths in the pipeline and going to be crucial in the coming months