Map / City Council / ← 2020-01-21 · 2020-02-04 →
City Council · study-session
City of Boulder City Council Study Session 1-28-20
- Date
- Series
- study-session
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed27 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personthe Pleasant Street law is owned by the University Hill general Improvement District and the Boulder City Council is its board of directors
staff provided a preliminary assessment of the site's affordable housing potential under three scenarios
first as an inclusionary project on the site with a combination of market rate and affordable units
staff estimated that the city could construct approximately 70 affordable units elsewhere in the city
estimating that the city's commercial linkage fee requirement would provide a one-time contribution of 1 million dollars
Council at its discretion may call up the concept plan for additional public input
where that fits in visa Vee the council call up well it's done a variety of ways for a variety of projects
do you ultimately believe that that's a good deal for the general Improvement District
then require more affordable housing or more funds
in terms of our affordable housing impact fee etc that they they would be required to pay those as part of the project
can council put some requirements on the TDM plan for example
a lot of them will probably be minimum wage or there abouts employees
at this point the conversations that we've had about the TDM plan are they're pretty conceptual
the general Improvement District is you guys are all aware you know it has a defined set of boundaries and a defined set of taxpayers
likely as with a lot of other minimum-wage jobs people do not live in Boulder
I would like it if possible to be a condition of the sale or the TDM
so this hotel is synergistic with a conference center which is what we insisted on
we again coordinated with all of our partners internal and external to cover the 2020 v-cycle funding and deficits
having a demand based cap in place is key and issues with parking generally with them on the sidewalk
they are resulting a net increase in greenhouse gas emissions and you can see there
staff has prepared a set of regulations to govern both e scooters and e bikes
that was to approve our current 2019 transportation master plan update
had paid close attention to things like emergency room visits crashes and the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions
we're not living up to our standard of vision zero which is to reduce injuries and deaths
according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration vehicle crashes including pedestrians and cyclists who are killed
part of this tonight was related to ebike so there's a scooter any bike
I'm not only from our greenhouse gas emissions standpoint assuming that the e-bikes last longer than the East scooters do
Recording
officialTranscript
derivedRead the transcript 193 segments
Automatic captions: words and names are often misheard.
A part of this recording is left out.
Documents
No documents on record.