Map / Planning Board / ← 2025-05-06 · 2025-05-27 →
Planning Board · regular
5-20-25 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed33 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personNow we can move on from minutes to discussion of call ups and continuations.
But I want everyone to not mistake discussing a call up item, to be a the call up itself right?
I'll call this up as well. Okay, so great. We have 2, and it's called up.
I believe they could do an adu. not a duplex or a no, not in this particular zone.
the House Bill that was passed related to minimum parking requirements.
So last year, Colorado State Legislature passed House Bill 2413, 0, 4.
There's a minor change that we've included in the ordinance that updates our energy conservation code
Staff, has been asked to design a Tdm ordinance that mitigates the impacts of new development on our transportation system
we're also working on how to deal with permanently affordable housing.
the most effective Tdm programs have ongoing annual costs, we'd be looking at ongoing and annual financial guarantees
We do a vehicle trip generation study conducted by a 3rd party using a methodology created by staff
That's a concern that I have is that currently our tools give us the ability to ask the applicant to provide less parking.
So we wouldn't get any kind of calculation that says, previously this project would have had a parking minimum of X spaces
These, these sets of codes, do they regulate how schools are built?
But other non-bsd other non-bbsd, I see, I see that's a distinction.
Does Hb. 13. 0, 4. Address Ada parking at all?
So it's nothing in this section lowers the protections provided for persons with disabilities, including the number of parking spaces
is there anything in 13? 0, 4 that precludes the city from having an Ada parking requirement in that frequent transit zone?
our estimates are that we'll be able to generate enough revenue from paid parking to cover the cost of the Eco passes.
sounds like number 2 was like e-bikes and lime scooters.
prevent developers from shifting the parking burden for luxury, student housing to established residential neighborhoods
unsuitable for e-bikes and cargo bikes, and they also have maintenance challenges.
We are observing the study of the retroactive application of the Wui ordinance
lowers the protections provided for persons with disabilities under the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act
I looked at House Bill 2413, 0, 4.
Is there any way that a municipality could require? Ada parking in such a proposal?
I'm hoping that one of my other board members might make some motions around those particularly around charging for e-bikes.
It's a wish that I wish we could apply to Bvsd, and it doesn't apply to Bvsd.
trying to reach our our goals. As stated in the Tmp. Our climate goals, all of these things
using the large, you know this board sees, has seen a number of large student housing projects come through
this is something we did for the accessory dwelling unit ordinance as we made incremental changes
Do you also want to extend it to form-based code? Because that also looks at large projects?
I specifically excluded form-based code. But thank you for bringing that up as I thought about that.