Map / Planning Board / ← 2024-04-16 · 2024-05-21 →
Planning Board · regular
5-7-24 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed38 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personThis provided flood, mitigation and a multi-use path connection along Iris.
So moving to the Bvcp Land use designation. This site and surrounding areas are designated high density residential.
The proposal provides an E. Scooter parking pad designed for use with Lyme E. Scooters to encourage last mile connections
The request is supported by the Tdm plan that includes Eco passes for residents
overall staff found the proposal consistent with the Site Review criteria, including with the underlying Bvcp.
Generally send a referral to Bvsd, so they can comment on the application.
is the increased requirements of the energy code are resulting in a lot higher height
When you did your analysis under the BBC P. Criteria, C reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
I am not sure that the current energy code has any references to carbon reduction.
I think you all are very familiar with bhp, we're the housing authority for the city of Boulder.
We're reusing an existing building. So in that existing building is all made of concrete
so we don't have to get rid of any of that. Embody carbon off the tossing on landfill.
So this commitment is to meet the energy codes for the city.
how much money comes to develop this project from the city's inclusionary housing ordinance.
our inclusionary housing funds have been put to good use
I'm understanding that you're using data from your existing, from BH. Ps, not yours.
But Bhp is unique. Every other project essentially has an individual ownership group, right?
Every other project essentially has an individual ownership group, right? So they have to do their Tdm individually.
one of the tools that they have at their disposal is to alter the Tdm.
So this is a hundred percent affordable because of the city's inclusionary housing.
okay. the second problem. affordable housing does not meet. make housing more affordable.
We just don't need more affordable housing that drives up the demand for affordable housing.
I'm especially excited about portions of the Bvcp. Where we are doing a mix of compatible uses at this site.
we've been working on a number of process improvements in planning and development services
that a vast or about 40% of these applications that were brought as call ups were floodplain permits or wetland permits
we heard a lot about the call ups adding significant time to the process and unpredictability.
We've removed the call up for floodplain and wetland permits.
as part of this project, it's not just code changes.
we expect that there would be approximately a 40% reduction in the number of call up memos that you all would see.
improvements for staff to standardize and increase efficiency for drafting call-up memos has the potential of being a far greater time.
improvements for staff to standardize and increase efficiency for drafting call-up memos has the potential of being a far greater time.
This was something that where we created some additional flexibility by establishing a new alternative, parking standard option only for unlisted uses.
Ordinance did change the Rl. Zones. In respect to allowing duplexes and triplexes.
like I was trying to get my my adu on at my place, and I got a spigot
free Palestine and I'm Jewish cause. I had to say that at every board meeting that I go to
We did that for the accessory dwelling unit changes kind of incremental changes
And it's just a green waste project and maybe also a recommendation on the capital improvement projects.
from a policy standpoint there's been a little bit of a shift in in terms of emphasis and support from that.