Map / Landmarks Board / ← 2026-01-07 · 2026-02-25 →
Landmarks Board · regular
02-04-26 Landmarks Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed16 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personToo many old folks who were in Boulder at the time that the Presbyterian Manor was built in 1960
It's a shame that the board is letting four houses go, given their condition, the history, the location, and their ability to supply affordable housing.
even though we all want more affordable housing, and affordable senior housing.
One of them is Presbyterian Manor, and it's really not so much this particular issue, but the process.
The Landmarks Board can't be responsible for affordable housing in this community.
regulations are intended to protect health, life, safety, and the high-hazard floodplain is kind of the most
when somebody uses an excuse of, it's in the floodplain, and it's legitimate that they can't invest in it
It's more how do you develop safely within the floodplain.
you should explore doing a documentary of this. with Sundance.
We are also a core team member of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan Update, which you all will see at your next regular meeting in March
The LDRC reviewed 30%, down from 63% the year before, and the Landmarks Board only reviewed 2 LAC applications last year.
we shifted the majority of design review cases from committee to staff.
we supported the adoption of the Wildland Urban Interface Regulations
the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan update will help shape the policies related to historic preservation.
everybody will be preparing for the Sundance Film Festival.
is it possible that the process of the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan update also shapes the future of the Historic Preservation Plan?