Map / City Council / ← 2020-10-13 · 2020-10-27 →
City Council · regular
Boulder City Council Meeting 10-20-20
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed46 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personfollowing the devastating 2013 flood the Civic area master plan presented a chance to leverage placemaking in the area's Redevelopment
led the establishment of communication between Boulder and the 13 tribal governments representing the indigenous populations who lived in
Civic area has transformed into a major convening space which now hosts a variety of events
the boulder municipal airport as a temporary aerial firefighting base for helicopters
when my father and a majority of City Council Members offered and passed the human rights ordinance
everybody forgot the work he did trying to promote affordable housing
it started with the mural on the Boulder Public Library
our Target population is homeless offenders and you can see there
I want to specifically focus on the road map's agriculture component
supporting local food producers in particular we recognize the value inherent in local food markets
with the inclusion of affordable commercial a significantly enhanced public Plaza
a significantly enhanced public Plaza that will include public art and murals as well enhanced bike lines
the bad news is that the US greenhouse gas emissions are still over 5.7 billion metric tons per year
with the issued 2C franchise agreement with Excel that path will be difficult to follow
asked Council not to do anything more for the homeless for fear it would attract more
downtown Boulder was behind the city's homeless policies and practices
we are experiencing an increasingly alarming climate emergency terrible wildfires around us
we continue to be committed to exemplifying what dynamic affordable commercial space could look like in this prominent location
the review is based on relevant site review criteria bbcp policies
and I assume this project is is subject to linkage fees correct
from the TDM analysis that the applicant did
so that number is actually calculated before they pull a building permit
the comp plan that is now in effect was what was in effect when they put the application in
public hearing is the second reading of items related to the 2021 budget
the city's operating budget represents 80% of the total budget
City staff will work with the Arts commission to fully fund the general operating Grant category
if Boulder Valley School District decides they do not uh need any sro's the police department would move
I hold the people that that approved that that uh approve a municipalization accountable
whatever the outcome of this thing I'm not going to go shouting in the street when municipalization
I implore you to reconsider this budget cut and find a different solution
one program the very expensive program of Grants is the one that's been cut for this year
to adopt ordinance 8431 designating the building and a portion of the property at 1770 13th Street as an individual Landmark
but there's not the formal mechanism of requiring like a landmark alteration certificate for interior work
it needs to stand with the design guidelines the Secretary of interior standards
the design guidelines and the Secretary of State um documents
to engage residents of the S Lazaro Mobile Home Park which is the only residential area
the way that these mixed use categories are described in the bbcp
I thought the the manufactured housing land use was part of the comp plan
my other question is about um annexation of um the mobile home parks
we need better water quality which is the big issue with that particular mobile home park
I could foresee you know with the working groups work with that community that a recommendation to Annex San Lazo
the big murf there which you know was run by ecycle
I was just flagging that there are going to be huge environmental issues there
I would rather we have like a pretty firm process for when a board member is replaced
we'd probably want to open a full recruiting window
somewhere around the 15th of um December we might start recruiting for next year