Map / Planning Board / ← 2024-09-24 · 2024-10-08 →
Planning Board · regular
10-01-24 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed25 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a persona total of 48 market rate, and 4 permanently affordable units are proposed among the 10 proposed new buildings
including 48 market rate and 4 permanently affordable units in 10 buildings
The building was initially determined to be eligible for local landmark designation, but was ultimately not required to pursue landmark designation.
So the proposed project is for 52 townhome style units, including 4 onsite permanently affordable units.
There are 88 private garage spaces and 9 surface spaces total.
The current proposal does not include the North South Multiuse Path connection or the East-west Secondary Street connection
The proposed project is consistent with the Bbcp land use, map, and on balance with the goals and policies of the Bvcp.
There's a scooter station provided on site. There's bicycle parking, I mean.
and this is largely achieved through the Tdm measures
Key issue number 3, which is the proposed amendment to the Bvrc. Transportation connections plan
In the applicant statement it says that for the inclusionary housing requirement that there will be 4 affordable for sale housing units
What we are doing here tonight we are not requiring the applicant to pursue landmarking.
they can change their option and meeting Ih at any point
That meeting the inclusion. Inclusionary housing requirement means you've met the inclusionary housing requirement.
Usually it's kind of the Tdm. Plan proposes what they think the reduction will be.
that showed that the current parking requirements tend to overbuild based on current usage patterns
and a lime scooter grove at the corner of 26 and spruce
We asked around a little bit and potentially could be about student housing.
the proposal does meet our Bvcp policies and our Site Review criteria in terms of the Bvcp
the project does include a decent Tdm. Which outlines strategies to reduce parking demand
as State law comes into effect, and we bring our code into alignment
We will not have parking minimums and at a site in this location.
it's critical, that that path design, be usable by people of all sorts of ages and abilities
to remove the East-west, secondary street connection and the North-south multi-use path connection through the properties
reading and discussing accommodation under the under the formal use of the word under the Ada accommodation