Map / Landmarks Board / ← 2024-07-10 · 2024-09-04 →
Landmarks Board · regular
8-7-24 Landmarks Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed23 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personThe board may disapprove the request, and this is subject to a 45 day call up period, and the owners would need to file a notice of appeal.
I'm the project manager for Bhp. On the 3,300 Penrose Place project.
So our mission is to provide safe, affordable housing for the community.
I think most of you are familiar with boulder housing partners. Bhp. Is the housing authority for the city of Boulder.
you don't normally associate with affordable housing. But we spent a lot of time on softening the rest of the site up.
It'll be affordable, permanently deed, restricted housing for the city of Boulder, which is awesome.
enables things like the millennium to be converted to high high end student housing
There's a tremendous amount of embodied carbon in there.
I want to applaud boulder boulder housing partners, for I think becoming involved with Golden West
The options in front of you this evening are to either approve the Lac application. That decision is subject to a 16 day city council call up period
So Staff is looking at the key design guidelines for the house, and so that would include the roof forms
the flood plain forces us to lift the home up approximately 3 feet because of the new flood plain
recent floodplain changes, wildfire concerns obviously energy, efficiency and sustainability
And so, in regards to the adu again, we essentially modified everything as requested by the landmarks board.
my other feeling of mass to scale is the adu in the back
I want to bring the adu in, and I think it's great.
especially in our increasing hailstone environment. As climate changes.
and is generally consistent with the West Pearl historic district guidelines, and the general design, guidelines for boulders
So the purpose of tonight's discussion is to introduce the scope and process of the proposed process improvements
that doesn't meet our design guidelines. If you revise it to an externally lit
What about public art?
Because there was noise about that once before, where art got installed in a historic district
I think public art probably should be looked at by the board.