Map / Landmarks Board / ← 2024-04-03 · 2024-06-05 →
Landmarks Board · regular
5-2-24 Landmarks Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed15 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personThen the entire property is outside of the hundred-year flood plain.
He arranged for the flood medication there and part of flood mitigation.
so that floods could be mitigated better in that area, and so that there wouldn't be harm to humans downstream.
is it the minimum number of parking spaces as required by the city? Currently that is driving their perception or their requirement for this space for parking.
Demand for parking is different than requirement for parking right?
it wasn't just one thing like the parking requirement that didn't work in terms of their development of the property
So Staff's recommendation tonight is the the Landmarks Board recommend to the City Council that it designate the property
I move the Landmarks Board recommend to the City Council that that it designates a property at 904 Mapleton Avenue as a local historic landmark
It does not meet the significance, criteria for individual landmark designation as is not associated with persons or events
And this demo is an example of unnecessary climate change.
Why do we need this stuff in our landfill? Whatever happened to reuse instead of recycle.
We have serious regulations regarding the disposal of materials, recycling and materials, separation of materials, etc.
building materials are required to be broken down, taken to recycling centers and other.
the historic district decision from Council was, let's see, 3 weeks ago or so.
Civic area landmarks process that didn't pass. But anyway, I just found the whole thing fascinating.