Map / City Council / ← 2021-12-14 · 2022-01-07 →
City Council · regular
Boulder City Council Meeting 1-4-22
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed25 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personwe were able to open South Boulder Rec Center very quickly for evacuees
that we're not actively enforcing o occupancy limits and so individuals providing temporary shelter for evacuee should not be concerned at this time
Boulder parks and recreation is honoring lewisville's Recreation Center passes at its three recreation centers
we're already not as I mentioned before enforcing occupancy limits generally and we're going to continue this practice
they're part of that agency administrator BR all of the folks to go to this
do we expect any Ripple effects on people who do qualify for affordable housing and are we taking steps to make sure
their house doesn't comply with the smart regs energy code requirements
fire prevention Specialists speak about the need to harden buildings against Flames everything from removing vegetation to close close to homes
recently counted eight people denied space in the boulder shelter on one night when paired with Boulder's camping ban
this presentation is about using the boulder occupation tax a carbon tax in an equitable way
so the net cost to be 100% Renewables is $24 for the whole year slide three
have every home and Business in Boulder with 100% Renewables today
housing students on campus is the obvious solution to this problem and the city needs to use all the levers
we need to assess the financial burden that student housing in our neighborhoods is placing on the city
landmarks DRC afterwards um reviewed um a small um interstitial space between the new um addition
the comprehensive plan has for decades identified the downtown as one of those three centers
both the comp plan and um the zoning I identify the site as being in the highest intensity categories
the board found that the proposed projects consistent with the regional business land use of the comp plan
this is a site review uh call up so unlike at the concept plans there's not really an opportunity
it was surveyed by architectural historians in 198 88 and found at that time to be eligible for landmark designation
it was supposed to be developed as affordable housing at that point that was part of the closure
there was a partnership with a bridge house that went on for a couple of Seasons they had a smaller number of beds
downtown ambassadors and for the park ranger program as well I just wanted to share
a combination of things so either um running a severe weather shelter or um day shelter or uh sanctioned encampment or safe parking
wondering if this is a place where we might consider leaning on any of our boards and commissions