Map / Planning Board / ← 2024-10-01 · 2024-10-15 →
Planning Board · regular
10-8-24 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed34 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personis this subject to the new 2 person call up, or the prior. one person call up requirement.
Or do you, as staff, have a way to allow or encourage removing extra parking spaces at this point
I believe one of them is required for accessibility requirements, especially as it relates to the downtown urban design guidelines for universal access
When we discuss a call up and have questions about a call up. it is it is not a Mini Site Review.
it wasn't clear to me if you were charging for separately unbundling the charge for the parking
And obviously the the office use had much more of a parking requirement.
I'm especially concerned about e-bike parking. I do think that e-bikes are the future
So I think that it would be good for you in terms of a selling point for your units to have more e-bike parking.
A concept plan, review, and comment for the redevelopment of 1840 and 1844, Folsom Street.
As such there are 2 Bvcp land use designations. The 1st one is high density residential
The site is also impacted by the 500 year Flood zone, which will require additional permitting at time of a future application.
One is the proposal generally compatible with the goals, objectives, and recommendations of the Bvcp.
And I'm also curious about the location of nearby transit stops and bike share facilities.
Question was about, the core arterial network project. And if this portion of Folsom is slated to be part of that.
I think in looking at the Tmp. we saw those 2 connections.
We're excited to share our concept. For 1840 and 1844 Folsom, Folsom Street, and to hear your feedback.
Folsom will offer a mix of studio, one bedroom, 2 bedroom, and 3 bedroom apartments designed to serve a wide variety of residents.
Part of our envisioning process includes Tdm. Measures such as some principles access to microtransit Eco passes and car share.
this space to the southwest would be the affordable commercial. That's what we're currently thinking.
You can't have stairs to get up to second floor units. There's gotta be accessible access to everything.
at least 40% of the floor area of the building is used for dwelling units that meet the requirements for permanently affordable units.
There are numerous other requirements in section 9 13, that are intended to ensure that the permanently affordable housing
If the developer insists on using the affordable housing exemption to exceed the normal requirements
In this geographic location there is a concern about public safety that we've faced in part due to the unhoused population.
In this geographic location there is a concern about public safety that we've faced in part due to the unhoused population.
it has issues with environmental issues as far as drainage as far as raising the urban Heat Island effect.
I also feel that as the climate changes. sun, access to sun and warmth is going to become less and less important
and the inclusionary housing, ordinance and community benefit all those things
I am encouraged by your words on your Tdm plan, and I know this is Concept review
The proposed project will meet the Boulder Valley comp plan goals of compatible development pattern.
I know how carefully landmarks, staff and the landmarks board, and the design. The their subcommittees look at projects like this for consistency with design guidelines.
Okay, this is the historic preservation to remove the appointment of planning board member to the landmarks board.
We have a pretty healthy training budget for the board.
I don't want to be the bad guy that creates call ups and extra work.