Map / Landmarks Board / ← 2023-09-06 · 2023-12-05 →
Landmarks Board · regular
11-1-23 Landmarks Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed18 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personThe flood considerations is again the entire site sits within the zone AZ.
This is a picture of the non-conforming basement. So this shows the kind of the extent of the foundation that would have to be ripped out to meet floodplain regulations.
And anyway, I also want more affordable housing in Boulder.
Affordable housing. I don't see how building a very large home like that is going to help with the affordable housing stock
And affordable housing and preservation for small buildings is often they're often in direct conflict.
One mechanism that we have used. That's part of the preservation program and broader to our community is accessory dwelling units.
It's a public hearing and consideration of a landmark alteration certificate application to construct an 804 square foot accessory building
As the changes are generally consistent with the general design guidelines, if the conditions are met.
the proposal is generally consistent with the general design guidelines and will generally comply with sections
distinguishing the proposed ADU from the original house
To be, it was student housing. Maybe. You probably remember it.
I'm glad that your ADA is going to allow people to visit with ease.
conditionally approve a landmark alteration certificate to construct a new accessory building at 7 0 3 11 street
if the council wanted to call up the decision and review it. If it is cold up, then a hearing would be scheduled within 45 days
So you have a great group. I'm a very big proponent of not reinventing the wheel
You the landmark sport is actually the ultimate decision maker for Design guidelines, not counsel.
Could it be used as an accessory dwelling unit?
how do you address the floodplain issues? Could it be added on to?