Map / Landmarks Board / ← 2024-03-06 · 2024-05-02 →
Landmarks Board · regular
4-3-24 Landmarks Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed22 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personWe own the building at 2260, baseline road we were in front of you in January to discuss the demolition of the building
The existing building prevents us from building structure, parking under the building, due to the number of structural
There are significant accessibility and energy efficiency challenges with keeping the building.
It's a disgrace for affordable housing in boulder, because each time you put in a, you know, 10 million dollar house.
You spread the wealth equity, and you get more people homeless and more people evicted.
Well, housing is also the curse in that the more housing, the more services, the more services, the more need for housing, the more wealthy, and equity, the more homelessness
Okay, start video. So in terms of the question about the floodplain that that you had
Your options tonight are to either approve the landmark, alteration, certificate, application, or approve it with conditions.
However, the use of metal roofing is not consistent with the design guidelines, or generally the character of the West pearl historic district.
so in our design, guideline summary, we identified key points that were inconsistent with the design guidelines.
because decks are not traditionally found on historic structures. They should be avoided, or their appearance should be minimized.
the current physical state of the home. As well as importantly, recent floodplain changes.
the fact that the what recent wildfire concerns in this house is basically a a tinder box
So we were. We did have some criteria and constraints in regards to the the adu.
and, of course, the same floodplain restrictions that we were dealing with, and we wanted it to to be concordant
The point is. This has carbon footprint that's costly.
North boulder last night at at I forget. After a while the planning board. Approved.
Is there need to be a full lifecycle analysis and embodied energy tradeoffs between what's used to build the new.
There needs to be a new housing, affordable board, because Hab doesn't really do that.
some pretty strong zoning restrictions on what that accessory structure can be
If we're gonna try to do that and provide that that opportunity for, you know, affordable housing in boulder in the in the historic districts.
and just like the issues with the adu. I think that adu. I don't think the design that we submitted was in its final form