topic · issue
Historic preservation design guidelines
- Kind
- issue
- Domain
- Historic preservation
- Seeded from
- “Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Update”
- Search phrases
- design guidelines, historic preservation guidelines
- On record
- 115 mentions in 49 meetings explorer count
Which bodies discuss it
AI-read · unreviewedRanked by meetings that mention it. Counts of model-chosen mentions; no person has checked them.
Across bodies and years
Dot size: meetings that mention it that year. Recordings reach back to 2011 for a few bodies and to 2022 for most; agendas only from April 2026.
Every mention, newest first
AI-read · unreviewedEach quote is verbatim from the captions or an agenda item (captions are automatic and may mishear). A mention says the subject came up, never what anyone thinks of it.
2026 12 mentions
by adopted design guidelines. Um and DAB has been tasked with making the recommendations to the applicant
I think in this case, it might be best served by the design guidelines for the district
under guidelines and design guidelines and role of DAB.
under guidelines, you could move the one entries
So if we do a brief overview of the guidelines, and then
The design guidelines talk about visibility from the public right-of-way throughout the design guidelines when talking about the potential impact to the historic character
to ensure that the final design of the addition is consistent with the general design guidelines
this project is largely regulated by landmarking rules and historic design, district design guidelines that the applicants have already been working through.
and it's consistent with the general design guidelines
consistent with the general design guidelines for Boulder's historic districts and individual landmarks, and the Mapleton Hill Historic District Design Guidelines
with the general design guidelines and the Mapleton Hill design guidelines and the intent of the approval
The color scheme of white, black, and navy may detract from the overall character of the site, as the guidelines recommend avoiding bright or garish colors.
2025 10 mentions
the rewriting you know, with the, Landmarks Board of the Downtown Design Guidelines
Ensure regulations and design guidelines are current, relevant, and provide effective protection of historic buildings
And I've had conversations with the City and County of Denver, who just updated their window and door design guidelines this last year
Which is to update the window and door design guidelines to allow for greater flexibility for replacement of non-character windows
generally consistent with the general design guidelines for Boulder's historic districts and individual landmarks
when the wildfire urban interface, the WUI code, was being developed, and I saw our historic preservation design guidelines
rather than provide, you know, a set of design guidelines that can be chipped away by attrition
This board can adopt administrative rules like design guidelines or process improvements.
and is generally consistent with the Mapleton Hill historic district guidelines and the general design guidelines
the design guidelines are very wise in not completely rolling them out, but generally advising against them
2024 43 mentions
it is not particularly consistent with the general design guidelines which indicates that the general design guidelines really should be amended
is generally consistent with the general design guidelines of bold guidelines of Boulder's historic districts
consistent with the general design guidelines the Mapleton Hill district design guidelines and the intent of
Guidelines encourage, maintaining the dominant roof, line, and orientation of the roof, form to the street.
shall be subject to final review and approval by staff to ensure that the final design of the addition is consistent with the general design guidelines.
is generally consistent with the Mapleton Hill historic district guidelines and the general design guidelines for Boulder's historic districts and individual landmarks.
I know how carefully landmarks, staff and the landmarks board, and the design. The their subcommittees look at projects like this for consistency with design guidelines.
and you know, we think it's most importantly respectful to Cca's design. Guidelines Federal design guidelines, as it pertains to adding new structures to historic sites
consistent with the general design Guidelines, the Chautauqua Park Historic District Design Guidelines, and the intent of this approval.
and is generally consistent with the Chautauqua Park historic district guidelines, and the general design guidelines for boulders, historic districts, and individual landmarks
So Staff is looking at the key design guidelines for the house, and so that would include the roof forms
that doesn't meet our design guidelines. If you revise it to an externally lit
and is generally consistent with the West Pearl historic district guidelines, and the general design, guidelines for boulders
and is generally consistent with the general design guidelines and the downtown historic district guidelines provided the stated conditions are met
that changing a character. Defining feature right on the front of the house didn't meet the design guidelines
in addition to the design guidelines, both the general design guidelines and the Mapleton Hill design guidelines
Historic district design guidelines and the general guidelines for Balders historic districts and individual landmarks
generally consistent with the general design guidelines and the Mapleton Hill design guidelines provided the stated conditions are met
So turning to the key design guidelines for the accessory building.
I was wondering the design guidelines seem relatively vague at this point
The guiding principles were developed collaboratively with the technical advisory group
The intent of the framework is to provide direction for reviewing alterations and for the development of district specific design guidelines
because decks are not traditionally found on historic structures. They should be avoided, or their appearance should be minimized.
so in our design, guideline summary, we identified key points that were inconsistent with the design guidelines.
However, the use of metal roofing is not consistent with the design guidelines, or generally the character of the West pearl historic district.
the proposal is generally consistent with the general design guidelines, and will generally comply with sections 2.0 and 3.3
and is generally consistent with the general design. Guidelines provided that the stated conditions are met
I think that the Re proposed material palette is consistent with the design guidelines.
And that's kind of where the design guidelines come in of like.
Can you talk about how the boundaries would affect what the design guidelines would be, or should be?
We then move to the draft design guideline framework in December, convening a technical advisory group
if it's designated you'll have involvement in the creation of design guidelines
these aren't fully cooked design guidelines in other District designations
the design guideline framework includes the intent scope and guidelines of the guiding
there are specific design guidelines for the historic district and there are other design guidelines for that area
designed guidelines can be either uh crafted before a designation hearing um at the essential time of
We're assisting with the design guidelines for the civic area historic district
the design guidelines are really elemental to this question of change, because it will speak to what elements can and cannot be changed
which are developed in conjunction with potential designation.
features that should be recognized in the ordinance or the design guidelines
biggest piece that conflicts with the design guidelines both for the district and for the general design guidelines
Staff finds that while the height of the front and side yard fence is inconsistent with the general design, guidelines
The general design guidelines in Mapleton Hill design guidelines, discourage front, yard fences
2023 30 mentions
Finding that the proposal meets the standards for issues of the landmark alteration certificate chapter 9 1118 BRC 1981 and is generally consistent with design guidelines
it generally is consistent with the general design guidelines and the makeup and start start district design guidelines.
the draft design guidelines have modified in scope, recognizing that it's a lot of work on the front end
the proposal is generally consistent with the general design guidelines and will generally comply with sections
As the changes are generally consistent with the general design guidelines, if the conditions are met.
You the landmark sport is actually the ultimate decision maker for Design guidelines, not counsel.
And it's been a while a long time since we developed design guidelines.
those draft design guidelines will be developed by a technical advisory group that will be comprised of a city staff department, representatives.
and also the general design guidelines for historic districts and individual landmarks.
Design guidelines are required as part of the historic district process, but they are very helpful when the properties are unique
perhaps a technical review committee to draft those design guidelines that would need to happen.
joint study session to look at design guidelines and help shape those before it then goes
the biggest difference between individual landmark designation and a historic district is the ability to create design guidelines
Those do the draft design guidelines. We would want to have input from from this board, and also the Landmark Board.
finding that the proposal meets the standards for issuance of landmark alterations certificate in chapter 9 11 18 BRC 1981 and is generally consistent with the general design guidelines
the discussion at the landmarks board was pretty detailed and the window design guidelines are very specific in
as it is generally consistent with the general design guidelines, and will generally comply with sections 2.0 and 3.3 of the general design guidelines
So we went through the entire design guidelines in the packet. So I'm just going to summarize here.
Although oversized dormers may make the best use of interior spaces, they are usually not appropriate.
the design guidelines have criteria for determining whether a facade is primary secondary or tertiary
moving to the additions generally staff in the landmarks board found the proposed additions to be consistent with the design guidelines
the restoration is aligned aligns and is encouraged by the general design guidelines
if it's a historic district, we would then look at the treatment and management recommendations which are a Kent to design guidelines
but in terms of it, meeting the design guidelines, I think the guidelines specifically say that it's not appropriate to add another story
So I wanted to start with the definitions of primary, secondary, and tertiary elevation, because the guidelines put an emphasis on that.
we found that it was not consistent with the design guidelines which talk about using traditional materials
the proposal is required to go to dev because it's located in the non-historic and interface area of the downtown design. Guidelines
so going into the analysis against the design guidelines, i'll just read through the guidelines for the artwork
and is generally inconsistent with the general design guidelines and the Mapleton Hill Historic District guidelines.
and will not comply with sections, 2 and 3.3 of the general design guidelines in Section 9, 1118 B.
2022 16 mentions
I think we shouldn't be overly inventive. I think what we should do is take queues from design, guidelines.
we usually refer to the district specific guidelines, because they are the ones that we are guided by
We mainly referred to the Downtown Urban Design Guidelines. Mainly, because they are very specific to the downtown
we would probably lean more on the side of, like the design guidelines approach
So the Mapleton Hill Historic District um design guidelines. We referred to uh include the building alignment
with the design guidelines say is that there's something that's diminished in Nature clearly separates itself from what is the historic to new
Section four hundred and five of our general design guidelines maintain the proportion, general style and symmetry, or asymmetry of the existing window patterns.
The memo is provides a preliminary consistency analysis with the guidelines in the Bbcp.
the concept plan does preliminarily meet the Boulder Valley Regional center design guidelines
And it's subject to the design guidelines that were adopted in 1980,
One is generally consistent with the general design guidelines and the University place district design guidelines
Guidelines refer to the general design Guidelines for non-historic stretches, which this is so in the general guidelines.
The historic district guidelines include guidance that if matching materials is impossible, simplify, and since this is new construction
design guidelines can be developed to um allow for the owner and this is this is when we whenever we do a historic district
historically important and then design design guidelines to acknowledge that and to be more specific about the change that can occur
actually the development of specific design guidelines for a district requirement and that's a collaborative pro process
2020 3 mentions
the design guidelines and the Secretary of State um documents
it needs to stand with the design guidelines the Secretary of interior standards
HISTORIC PRESERVATION STANDARDS THAT WE HAVE IN OUR DESIGN GUIDELINES
2019 1 mention
made improvements to the demolition review process and updated on various design guidelines