Map / Planning Board / ← 2025-07-22 · 2025-08-19 →
Planning Board · regular
8-5-25 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed40 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a persondid this developer ever go back to Ldrc when they were modifying those historic structures on it
I think it should be a hundred 40%, because the impact on this community is tremendous
look at what we've got coming here, Sundance, we've got the roots. Music Festival that's preceding sundance
It just drives up homelessness here to the point.
There's 2 2 homeless people for every one that leaves.
Subject site is zoned RH. 5, and surrounded by Rh. 5 zones on all sides
The city's transportation master Plan shows a sidewalk connection along the Northern property running east-west
If there's any shared parking between the 2 sites in the building.
Has city council officially said parking minimums are gone.
We propose to provide valuable student housing to the University of Colorado in a location
We propose to provide valuable student housing to the University of Colorado in a location
Student housing, we feel, is the best use for this site as it supports the purpose of the Rh. 5 zone
Student housing, we feel, is the best use for this site as it supports the purpose of the Rh. 5 zone
the potential for a local artist to create a mural to provide some interest along the street
and then again to try and mitigate the Heat Island effect, you know, up on the roof.
how do you know how many additional affordable units we are getting?
But the tdm, plan that, we will provide extra bike parking spaces connectivity.
remodel the creek and do a clomer and a Lomer.
The 100 Year floodplain comes down from Skunk creek floods certain parts of that side of town
I assume that you are having unbundled paid parking, given the small supply of parking in relation to the number of residents.
And how will that function with your new sidewalks that are required by the transportation master plan.
that allows for the storage of larger bicycles, cargo, bicycles, e-bikes, and scooters
Does not meet the Boulder Valley Comp. Plan 1.1 1 jobs versus housing for the quantification
demand for services at the Rec. Centers, at the libraries, by the police, by the fire
the bicycles are actually using up, you know, carbon footprint in the tires
And do we have thoughts about consistency with Bvcp policies
and then be certain when you come back that in your Tdm. Plan that you have unbundled
I do believe this is consistent with our Bvcp calls of compact infill development
we would love to see a lot more horizontal versus vertical bike space
We also, as I mentioned, previously, required the construction of 6 accessory dwelling units.
The 2 bedroom units are deed restricted at 100 to 120% ami
So annexations with additional development potential are required to demonstrate community benefit consistent with Bbcp policies
So we did get 6 accessory dwelling units that are required to be constructed
staff does find that the proposed agreement, the Annexation Agreement amendment remains consistent with the Boulder Valley Comp plan
they'll be required to meet the residential energy code, which is, as you know, is very robust
We didn't count them as affordable housing as such, but it's kind of filling a similar gap
Read Palestine, Bray Palestine. That's where we need money here.
we have to abide by the 20 foot, and we all know that it's measured 25 feet out
to be attached to this agenda item for the approval of the Annexation agreement amendment
So I don't know how we get what process there is to swap out existing liaisons with the new ones that were appointed.