Map / Planning Board / ← 2024-01-23 · 2024-02-20 →
Planning Board · regular
2-6-24 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed35 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a persononce again, II find myself discussing Tdm requirements in relation to Site Review.
Did you consider? using the parking management techniques that the city promotes, some separated, unbundled, managed, and paid with in in your plan for the parking.
And I I'm not sure how your Tdm plan really addresses either the parking situation or the encouragement to live. Using bike e bike pedestrian transit
Do you consider your Tdm plan as submitted to be your final and best effort.
Will that charging be in the garage? And will it be in a secured bike storage area where heavier, longer e-bikes can both be managed
That the North Boulder subcommunity plan identifies this as being in a service industrial area.
The first phase of the Site Review criteria updates were mostly focused obviously around the affordable housing and adding that density and intensity, bonus
a lot of the development that was spurred by the North Boulder subcommittee plan, and all the flat roofs
we talk a lot about affordable housing. I am a huge proponent of affordable housing.
lost probably a year of the process to get the town home site to be affordable housing rezone
We can't, couldn't rezone and get the density that Bhp. Would even want to take it.
yeah, that's that's a good question, and it is primarily the. It's the Bvcp policies that I was looking at again.
we have related to the Bvcp policies, including affordability, is on balance. Does it meet the Bvcp goals and objectives?
just speaking to the Boulder Valley Comp plan. I think that the neighborhood compatibility we heard a lot of input
Amending title 9, land use Code, Brc. 1981, to clarify existing code sections,
So the only thing related to the land use code is the location that the the businesses can be located in.
Planning Board recommends that city Council adopt ordinance 8, 6, 2, 0, amending title, 9, land use code to clarify existing code sections
public infrastructure and public safety requirements, accessibility standards, and then just generally appropriate
accessible parking and oversized vehicle, access and parking so to answer is the main benefit.
The West Tsa also specifically calls for trailhead improvements to increase access for people with disabilities wherever feasible.
We have concrete at our accessible parking spots, and then at at the walkway
instead of dragging trailers with horses in them up here that it's a big carbon footprint
If we get attacked by Iran because of our situation of not following Palestinian basic rights done.
the current configuration with the paved creek path going under Boulder canyon drive coming up is completely Ada compliant.
A brief overview of the South Boulder Creek flood mitigation project.
As it enters into Boulder. As a natural system. South Boulder Creek has a history of flooding over time.
The mitigation project itself will ultimately protect approximately 2,300 residents in this area 260 structures that are downstream.
Who are we annexing that land from? Is that city own land already?
It is within area 3. So the city owned portion.
So you can see within the proposed annexation area.
normally, you know, we don't consider area 3 properties as part of annexations.
Second, is the annexation proposal that we just reviewed.
the mapping and functional evaluation of wetlands on the larger sea south properties that's to adjacent to the West
on that C use out wetland mapping that will be introduced for first reading with City Council on March seventh
this is an information item and update on the Boulder airport community conversation.