Map / Planning Board / ← 2023-06-06 · 2023-07-11 →
Planning Board · regular
6-20-23 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed48 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personon May thirtieth of this year the historic folder, the friends of the Bandshell and the Tea house submitted application for a civic historic district
suggested that the civic historic district would be a a good idea, and that the landmarks board and the city
I don't think anybody on the Planning Board ever heard of historic district, and I wanted to make sure
and doubles also the Osbt deficit of 300 million 2 multiples of that.
So we adopted the form based code to apply it to the hospital site.
we started talking to their consultants on the Alpine balsam form base code from lessons learned
The form based. Code we approved is not exactly the same form-based code that was approved at Folder Junction.
There's a Creek Goose creek, and it's watershed are underneath that site.
entire water management system, which is where Goose Creek would flow
the Alpine balsam area plan was adopted after a lengthy public process to determine what we wanted for that site
they're just trying to implement the Alpine balsam area plan as it's been adopted through the public process
to essentially not allow it to go through form based code review.
Next item is, call up, item, floodplain development. Permit fld 202-30-0004.
authorizing the city manager to re-establish land, use approvals, and that needs to be specific to use review and conditional use approvals.
by increasing the length of time and approval of land, uses valid after discontinuance to 3 years
The Bvrc is defined in the Butter Valley comprehensive plan as a high, intensive regional commercial center
The proposal includes a request to modify the Bvr C transportation connection plan
This proposal requires an amendment to the Vvrc. Transportation Connections plan
The total amount of fees that would be provided for inclusionary housing by this project would be about 18.9 million based on our current fees.
we have 25% inclusionary housing for the first 3 floors and 36 for the fourth floor
But how many actual bonus units that we get in affordable housing.
what that's worth in terms of affordable housing fees.
the 3 year eco-pass term, and I have lots of other problems with this
and we have exceeded our parking and bike parking requirements by a a lot.
Tab did support our Tdm. And transportation Master Plan amendments next slide.
So overall we are replacing trees at greater than a 3 to one ratio on site
and the Heat Island effect or reducing the Heat Island effect
We're also increasing the tree canopy and the Heat Island effect or reducing the Heat Island effect.
We mentioned affordable housing. We have been doing quick back of the envelope calculations.
So I think our our parking reduction is overall for visitors and guests.
So the encampments and have not been happening there, because it is privately owned.
They are state entity. We are a city. We deserve to keep our city here.
the students in this community have taken over.
The city of the City of Boulder needs sales tax revenue?
something from the site review. That's not. That's not comp plan.
and it meets enough of the Bbcp policies that I will say that
there needs to be a direct relationship between the client they're hoping to serve and the parking requirements
If this is luxury student housing, which is what we've been seeing.
in light of the rough numbers we have for the inclusionary housing program
I think this applicant has a pretty robust Tdm. Plans.
More car sharing maybe having a scooter location, scooter rentals, something more innovative
I'm not gonna deny the project based on their Tdm plan could be better.
Calculations are based on an assumption that student housing generates 18 less vehicle trips
Does the Board support the proposed amendments to the Bvr. C. Transportation connections plan.
we do view this consideration of the future of the airport to be a land use, change issue
this idea of decommissioning the airport and having housing
for that first bullet point about estimating costs, resources, and level of effort to negotiate with the Faa
Here's about how much we would expect in property taxes and sales taxes