Map / Planning Board / ← 2025-03-04 · 2025-04-01 →
Planning Board · regular
3-18-25 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed30 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personMore development out in our flagpole annexation, which should never have been a flagpole annexation.
it was more classified as a recreational trail rather than an accessible trail for commuting and connectivity.
Accessibility is a key element of many trail systems and a ditch trail.
The site and the surrounding parcels are subject to connections found in Tvap as well as the Tmp.
The applicant has provided a Tdm plan which details the site characteristics and Tdm.
One of the points of feedback that we heard from the Concept Review was to bring us back a great Tdm.
access to the property's bike share fleet, which will include e-bikes.
combined with the affordable housing parcel that's scheduled to go in a couple lots to the north
the zoning for affordable housing that Council adopted is the most recent vision for this area
we've seen the proliferation of new types of bikes. Specifically, e-cargo bikes are a lot different
Now, thanks to the leadership of city council, parking minimums were reduced, density was rewarded
climate change has escalated from concern to emergency since 2,007
Such a design is not found in the existing 2019 transportation master plan
Remember that for every affordable housing now, and this project is not affordable, this is high-end housing.
I agree with the staff analysis that this project is, on the whole, consistent with the Bvcp.
the proposed modifications to the access and transportation connections actually improve on the grid
for any neighborhood or commercial district, empty storefronts are an adverse impact
which have ground floor vacancies, and which have chosen to put their functional primary entrances on the backside.
that would help it come into conformity with its subcommunity plan, which is one of our site review criteria
the way that this project is asking us to be extremely flexible about things like sub community plans and area plans
thinking about this project in terms of a different plan. And that's the Bvcp.
we are having pushback even on the East Boulder subcommunity plan, which was literally just adopted
they would like something attached to it, reducing further reducing the parking requirement
So now you have a fenced, less accessible strip at ground level that does diminish both the access for those with accessibility needs
I move that the application be amended, so that some principles are required for all parking
to pay the cash in lieu, and to provide the community benefit of this, the 4th floor.
We did this with the parking garage at Alpine balsam.
you responded to one of these suggestions regarding the cip, and you said that planning board has no purview over budgetary matters
The charter should be amended to get rid of this if if it if planning board really is not going to have a a practical role in reviewing the cip
We do have a traditional role in the cip