Map / Planning Board / ← 2025-01-07 · 2025-01-28 →
Planning Board · regular
1-21-25 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed44 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personwith a new 170,000 square foot addition to the Fraser retirement community at 350 Ponca Place.
If we were to use the standard attached residential parking requirements for this project.
whether the proposed concept plan is consistent with the Boulder Valley Comp plan, land, use map
it would likely also fulfill community needs related to Bvcp policies regarding populations with special needs
So it's not listed as future planned bike lanes in the transportation master plan.
Does a congregate care use? Have any kind of affordable housing requirement. No, not on its own.
either there's something in the transportation master Plan. That shows a new street connection
They have to either have 25% on site or pay into the inclusionary Housing Fund.
I realize that the church itself is in the floodplain
they would have to get a floodplain development permit for an addition to a building
It talks about historic preservation, demolition review application.
But you don't want to be approving a Site Review that hasn't considered the potential historic preservation aspects of the project.
The applicant deserves due process, and we should not be landmarking in a de facto way through site review
The church was also interested in wondering about adding affordable housing in the boulder community.
We also looked at the existing conditions in terms of the floodplain that came up earlier.
Since the Marshall fire. We're all aware that it's going to need to have fire, sprinkler, fire, alarm
This would contribute 9 million dollars to the city's affordable housing fund.
other contributions Fraser has made towards affordable housing in the community directly with boulder housing partners
that this project would pay towards the city's inclusionary Housing Fund.
Is it feasible to enter into the lower level.
we're gonna have to have as an accessible route and accessible access to the public way.
I think it makes a lot of sense to do a pedestrian demand and a traffic study.
the city is about to begin extensive flood protection this year on what's called Cu South.
This is what drives homelessness in boulder plus the private equity investors
to achieve 0 net carbon emissions, which I understand is also one of the goals of the city of boulder.
We believe that either an air source, heat pump or a ground source heat pump with insulation would replace all our gas consumption.
It's the plan that we ask applicants to put together to say, here's how we're going to reduce demand for cars for our site
because that's going to be hard for people to lift their e-bike onto, especially for seniors.
This proposal is consistent with the policies of the Bvcp.
the public hearing for consideration of site Review for the redevelopment of a 9.8 7 acre site at 1855 South Flatiron Court.
The site is located within the East Boulder Subcommunity plan, which envisions mixed, use developments with residential
a new multi-use path connection proposed along the northern side of the site, as shown in the East Boulder sub community plan.
Staff finds that overall the project is consistent with the plan.
But they wouldn't get extended with the vested rights they would get. They would not, they would not.
bicycle connection through that ramble area, that sort of east-west.
They're asking for 23% reduction which is somewhat in the opposite direction of what I expect.
currently in their Tdm. Plan, it states that they will be providing Ecopaxes for the 1st 3 years of building operation
plus the additional 20, more or less that will be planned at the E-bike station at the end of the trail.
So the idea is A B cycle station. Not a scooter station.
And that's on that bike path where sort of where it intersects with South Flatiron Court.
I think you said that you calculated your parking requirement based on office requirements.
Beautiful design. but free Palestine. Or else there's no point in building all of this
that require more services that we have deficits, for in all of the departments
We have no room for homelessness, more homelessness, as all of these high paying jobs are driving the demand