Map / City Council / ← 2021-01-23 · 2021-02-02 →
City Council · study-session
Boulder City Council Study Session 1-26-2021
- Date
- Series
- study-session
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed46 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personan update on the amps uh parking management parking strategy implementation
standing up the eviction prevention services program has provided the opportunity for the city to align
the coordinator will assess the tenant situation to determine whether rental assistance is needed and gauge whether legal
the mediation program recognizes the importance of encouraging early tenant engagement and there have been ongoing efforts
the coordinator can connect them with supportive housing services so not all evictions result in homelessness
that's very much focused on family homelessness um but until coven hit
we could still call it no eviction without representation the the name of the ballot measure that would be
amps is short for access management and parking strategies
related to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and responding to climate change
the boulder valley comprehensive plan with which outlines land use policies and the vision for our community
the transportation master plan which outlines the city's multimodal transportation policies
our chautauqua access and management program is our annual uh parking management and free shuttle service
the npp program generates less than half of the funding that would be needed for operational administrative and capital expenses
decisions around our capital improvement plans for our district owned assets in the downtown
parking for assets that are owned by individual taxing districts like downtown university hill and boulder junction
their interests are related to the transportation master plan and the tmp goals specifically
from um the downtown management commission or the downtown boulder partnership or other stakeholders
that might not see the transportation master plan as the only um uh set of policy guidance
outdoor dining is are we looking at that in this process too
this particular project will not be addressing that particular program that program was recently extended
we don't want to make the lack of visitors downtown a permanent thing
whether it's for outdoor dining or some other unforeseen disruptive technology
who is our alpine balsam implementation project manager
the alpine balsam property and its history the city purchased alpine balsam in 2015
reconsidered the parcel previously identified as county services as affordable housing
they're in the in the middle are intended to be affordable apartment style buildings
as a reminder of what the area plan says for each of these parcels
to prioritize reuse of building materials over recycling and then prioritize that recycling over landfilling
we will be holding several auctions to direct the reuse of materials
prescribe the amount of recycled material that we need through deconstruction
it does successfully remove the pavilion building from the floodplain
bring the site near or to net zero
city council adopted land use changes in december as part of the midterm comp plan update
we've recently hired a consultant to help write the form based code
you will see an upcoming city council agenda item on february 9th the culture community culture and safety tax renewal
um on the flood um piece of this you mentioned the goose creek master plan
we do think that we could have some cip dollars designated to it
the challenge that exists related to our flooded mitigation project on the site
so much you know carbon dioxide was emitted in the creation of this
for more affordable commercial space or for residential space
the building floor plate and the form of the building really lends itself to um you know healthy buildings
this is not talking about affordable commercial as eighty percent of um uh
the f the form based code is really exciting and then i'll be curious to see what they um come up with
if we have a form-based code that will dictate very specifically what has to go there
it's earmarked right now in general fund as a bond payment
considering maybe a bond funding mechanism at some point in the future or are we thinking we'll be paying for it out of revenues