Map / Planning Board / ← 2024-02-27 · 2024-03-19 →
Planning Board · regular
3-5-24 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed31 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personI notice that you haven't mentioned continued work on the area. 3 planning reserve at Council's direction planning staff
It is very important that the city manager and planning staff understand the importance and the sense of urgency to prepare
Community feedback indicates the community community desires to keep the airport and improve conditions in the near term
should you recommend that work commence on a process before council actually makes a final recommendation on the airport with the East Boulder subcommunity plan
A floodplain development permit application for the phase. Temporary construction fence plane required for demolition
do they have an actual deconstruction plan, where they will be reclaiming and recycling rather than tipping everything
The annexation is related to the construction of South Boulder Creek Flood project, and that's particularly spillway floodwall
The annexation is related to the construction of South Boulder Creek Flood project, and that's particularly spillway floodwall
Land may be considered for annexation if it complies with State annexation, statutes, and the policies of Boulder Valley
and if a property is annexed. Zoning is also then established according to the land. Use designation
those area 3 properties may be considered for annexation if they meet these specific criteria, that they be publicly owned
in terms of zoning. If a property is annexed, then the city zoning would be established consistent with the goals
the staff recommends a planning board, adopt the following motion to recommend a city council approval of the proposed annexation
I'm paying 4 million more by this not being a 500 year flood plain
we have no business giving them handouts when we have homeless problem
key issue number 2, Bvcp policies is the proposal consistent with cities, annexation and other Boulder Valley Comp plan policies
So that's the Parking, Tdm and Ntp program. And then also Ml's idea about the embody carbon investigations
we're encouraged to hear the staff is exploring ways to incorporate embodied carbon quantification and reduction
I would consider changing quantification and reduction to to incorporate, embody carbon accountability into city energy code and building code
But our goal is reduction. Our goal is not punishment.
the zoning for affordable housing. 2 is a work plan. Item. So it should actually be.
So this, again is about further study of airport scenarios 3 and 4 airport scenario, 3 being an airport retention and growth scenario
If decommissioning is not viable, and we're going to keep the airport.
test for interest in both market rate and permanently affordable deed, restricted units of various types and sizes
it seems like all we're approving, or the vast majority of what we're approving is student housing
you only houses, freshmen, and a few others. So there's something like 25,000 students who have to go find housing
do we know that we need student housing. I mean how I get it
why developers are building so much student housing here
We never, we never, ever account for the economic realities of parking requirements ever right.
the language itself talks right it it's it includes the idea that this is about affordable housing
you know, talks about affordable housing and affordable housing and 2 different programs