Map / Parks and Recreation Advisory Board / ← 2026-03-23 · 2026-04-27 →
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board · regular
03-31-26 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed21 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personthen later this year, the PRAB, along with other advisory boards and commissions, will see the City Manager's recommended 2027 budget
our public recreation centers are critical to achieving a community where every member's health and well-being
Our current operating budgets are not sufficient to meet the current level of service.
All of our facilities must meet the city's building and energy code.
We're looking at potentially generating revenue from them through the sale of those properties to help support more capital projects.
in some cases, we're taking them down because they're in the high hazard flood zone
we had a civic area plan that has essentially been stalled
it's served to move our first responders out of the high-hazard flood zone
within the next few years, within our CIP period, and we have a 6-year CIP period.
And then other amenities where it could be considered on an individual center basis.
especially the experience for people with disabilities that they must experience in all of our rec centers
In May, on May 14th, will be the City Council discussion on 2026 ballot measures.
Because they were talking about possibly doing, some further ability to create debt or a new tax
So, Scenario A says it reduces emissions through electrification.
So how can building new pools be considered environmentally sustainable in one location, but removing them is considered environmentally beneficial in another location?
significantly going to reduce energy and greenhouse gas emissions over time by eliminating the pool and electrifying the building
It says it reduces greenhouse gas emissions through electrification and improves spaces used for emergency sheltering.
It's, from my understanding and the experience that I've had with ADA issues.
It's not ADA compliant, which is very difficult when you try to meet the needs of the community.
since these projects at East were proposed in 2021, the city has adopted new building and energy codes
it's the timeline that I laid out, that slide of April 9th, City Council study session, May 14th, conversation on ballot measures