Map / City Council / ← 2016-06-21 · 2017-01-03 →
City Council · regular
City of Boulder - Council Meeting 12/06/16
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed37 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personplayed a really wonderful role in the civic area plan and the visioning processes process around that
We had 2 H, the product distribution tax on sugar sweetened beverages.
And we had measure 302 term limits for council members. 31,951 voted in favor. 21,961 were opposed.
I'm also speaking about the symbolic sanctuary status of the city of Boulder.
if we considered sanctuary status, we could motivate immigrants and undocumented immigrants to stay in the city of Boulder
Boulder has previously taken excellent steps in terms of supporting indigenous rights such as passing resolution 1190
I urge you to approve the resolution in support of Native Americans at Standing Rock.
should take steps to make Boulder a sanctuary city in the immediate future.
I know the city understands that one of its duties is to its citizens is to do its part to mitigate climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emiss emissions.
My issue is with the Dairy Center of the Arts.
I'm a resident in Mapleton Mobile Home Park, a 501c3 residential nonprofit, 137 units on 15 acres in the very heart of Boulder.
It was a dozen years ago, nearly to the day, that our resident controlled mobile home park was established
At the Boulder Valley Real Estate Conference's affordable housing linkage fee session
I attended a Boulder Housing Partners board meeting where I asked why they would advocate for such a low affordable housing linkage fee.
I thought it odd that the city's housing authority would be advocating for such a low amount
developing and supporting a multicultural community center in the civic area and should be part of the civic area plan
there are a bunch of homeless people tonight on the coldest night of the year
the resolution 281 amending 26 downtown commercial district fund formerly KED um budget
and it also undermines our transportation master plan.
being forcibly annexed to the city as an ongoing thriving business
we were not allowed to participate in the MAP because we weren't even informed we were being annexed into the city from the county
aside from the annexation issues
Asked whether I had a conflict of interest because we represent the Boulder housing uh Boulder Housing Partners
the general fund subsidizes rental licensing to some extent
It can't go up much, but they have something they can sell when they leave.
do we also have the deed restricted permanently affordable uh on the rate that that home can appreciate
So it's 15 human beings is the maximum that you can have in a high density zone.
if you think about the occupancy limit of four in the the higher density zones currently
we're either going enforce occupancy limits as we've been saying all along or we're not.
our whole transportation master plan is built around this idea of reducing emissions
the city actually saves $600,000 annually now because of the energy performance contracts that we've done
especially around decarbonizing our electricity sources now could lead to dramatic reductions by 2030
there are a number of things that are moving forward in terms of energy codes
no matter which option we took municipalization or um negotiation and um with Excel
I'd move also to adopt sub goals and progress indicators related to energy system change
We also have our own inclusionary policy uh resolution.
This is a legal dispute between a Native American tribe and a private company over the routing of a pipeline