Map / City Council / ← 2016-06-14 · 2016-12-06 →
City Council · regular
Boulder City Council Meeting - June 21, 2016
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed32 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personadding item 1A declaration for general aviation appreciation month so do have a motion second
our first item is a declaration regarding general aviation appreciation month that will be presented
bould has a significant interest in uh the Vitality of general aviation and that includes um Aviation educational institutions organizations Community airports
and I was pretty much told good luck so I called the police and and I said I'm here at Boulder Park and I'm homeless with my two girls
I was paying $750 a month cost for my kids to be in foster care yet I was homeless and in this review
although the recommendation was adopted the North Boulder subc commmunity plan was never amended to reflect this change
during our lengthly six-year annexation process this proposed Road was vigorously opposed by the majority of neighbors
we were told that it was required because of the North Boulder subcommunity plan
she had a baby with her and she was homeless and uh my friend we were having a very casual friendly conversation
by city council we also wish to note that our annexation has already provided Community benefit by helping to fund
the agreement really has no teeth there are no specific deliverables such as lower carbon less fossil fuels and more customer choices
Boulder might want to negotiate an arrangement with Excel that's similar to minneapolis's clean energy partnership agreement
providing nearly 800,000 trips on the Hop and rtd's access accessori program which is an ADA mandated Paratransit program
we really look forward to partnering with the city on implementing the goals and the programs of the transportation master plan
they would be exempt from occupancy limits and there's some proposed amendments that uh impose occupancy limits
one alternative that's not quite a third party would be to turn to Boulder housing Partners For assistance with this
I don't know if we've consulted with BHP about sort of extending getting outside the realm of what they do
you know that could be a housing board it could be BHP it could be something other than um the third party
you might want to think about how we pay for that and whether we fund specific resources to enforce
so affordable deed restrict rest is what you're talking about yes affordable deed restriction
there's a few ways that deed restriction work one is that a house can only appreciate it at a certain rate per year
that over the last few budget Cycles we have added additional uh enforcement and I appreciate that
we certainly have improved our performance on Code Enforcement over the last few years with the additional budget things
one of the criticisms we heard about the old ordinance was the the off street parking requirements made it virtually impossible to create a co-op
I don't support the approach of the the one off street parking space per two occupants
I'd like to see a TDM approach which is um transportation demand management which is how we go with our other kind of development approaches in town
all I can say is TDM plans don't excite me um they just they're you know they're nice they're on paper
I mean I I think TDMs are quite useful and Commercial you know buildings where you've got somebody who's paid to you know at least do part of that work
in the the original ordinance in 963b it includes adus and boarding houses I think uh and Council said take those out
I think you'd still need some Maximum somewhere I mean but I don't yeah I forget which it you could have an awful lot of people
some healing could come out of that and some Community dialogue could come out of that and maybe some better
trying to mesh it with our complicated code over the last few months