Map / Planning Board / ← 2024-09-03 · 2024-09-24 →
Planning Board · regular
9-17-24 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed33 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personBoulder's experience with relaxing adu. Restrictions, for instance, has not led to a sudden proliferation of adus.
the Faa gave us the right to use it as an airport if we accepted the funds to have it as an airport.
tonight we're going to talk about the family friendly, vibrant Neighborhoods project, which is a new City Council work program item for 2024.
We expect it basically grows out of the prior zoning for affordable housing project.
our guidance comes predominantly from the Boulder Valley Commerative plan, which sets the vision for the city in a number of different areas
So you're you're probably pretty aware of some of the changes that happened at the State Legislature this year.
There's a bill on accessory dwelling units that says that they should be required in each single family house
So there's the residential occupancy limits which basically makes occupancy based on family status prohibited per the state law.
our Gms program inconsistent with State law. So that was repealed.
How we evolved from the zoning for affordable housing project to the current family friendly, vibrant neighborhoods.
So there's been a lot of community engagement on these topics extending from the zoning for affordable housing project.
we should focus more on in lieu fees or commercial linkage fees, or just requiring deed, restricted units.
has now evolved into this family friendly, vibrant neighborhoods project.
So it does set density maximums in the Bvcp. But it talks about it being more of an average across an area.
So that's what's kind of led to the name being called family friendly, vibrant neighborhoods.
Units that get added contribute in low fees to our affordable housing fund
We've seen a lot of families moving out and enrollment in schools has been going down.
And that would clearly not be consistent with the Bvcp.
I know there's an interest in getting more deed, restricted, permanent affordability with these
I would simply add that the question posed in the packet in the Rmx. One zone about parking
But schools are something that we talk about in this community. We're losing school enrollment at our schools.
as a way to try to retain and gain affordable housing has inclusionary housing funds.
for we know that there's now a stream for middle income housing.
It's related to what happens with adus under the current or past occupancy requirements for adus.
And you know the comment I made earlier about inclusionary housing money is this.
So if we're already applying similar design, related criteria as part of this administrative process
Does anyone in Boulder do that except Bhp.
that we can't constrain many projects that are Bhp projects in ways that we could a private project
in ways that we could a private project paying into our the Inclusionary Housing Fund
I don't know why we would eliminate this unless Bhp can really prove out that there is cost
But I think mostly we don't want to see a whole prevalence of of site reviews on really small sites
when we were doing the use tables in the East boulder sub community plan
It helps us to create boundaries about where we can annex, where we can expand those sorts of things.