Map / Planning Board / ← 2023-09-05 · 2023-09-26 →
Planning Board · regular
9-19-23 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed22 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personIf the what's currently proposed under zoning for affordable housing is approved. the minimum lot size in this zone would go down to 7,500 square feet right?
Designation for the site is medium density residential, which is described here as being characterized by a variety of housing types
to address concerns about potential loss of affordable housing and the displacement of residents that could result from the redevelopment of the park
Transportation staff has recommended removing one of these proposed access points off 30 Fourth Street, and coordinating with the neighboring property owner
the fact that the 44 units are intended to be 100% permanently affordable housing managed by boulder housing partners
if the zoning for affordable housing ordinance passes as it is written. would this site be able to have increased density?
I believe that that ordinance, as currently written, exempts projects that are 100% affordable housing from site review.
I believe that that ordinance, as currently written, exempts projects that are 100% affordable housing from site review.
as far as I can tell. It's not. It's not specifying one side or the other of 30 Fourth Street.
There's gonna be 44 affordable housing units. 70% of the entire site is open space.
So the in the transportation master plan, there's a connection that they'd like to make on this
So in in the transportation master plan. It basically is just a swath across the site.
So there's no Bhp community here. Currently we just own the land.
neither our management company were contacted directly by BHP. Or the city.
the multi use path is sited straddling the property line on both BHP. Property and arbor wood property.
Yes, I think it does meet the requirements for boulder belly to comp plan
I think that it's great to get these kinds of more family friendly units that.
if I were interpreting, for example, the Comp plan, when it talks about on-site open spaces under policy 2.4
There was a recommendation to try to delay accepting faa funding where possible
the recommendation from planning board about the cip regarding the airport items
as Council deliberates on the budget, and any requests that they have for budget changes
not wanting to hamper the operations and save maintenance of the airport.