Map / Planning Board / ← 2023-04-04 · 2023-04-25 →
Planning Board · regular
4-18-23 Planning Board Meeting
- Date
- Series
- regular
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed30 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personSo the the argument that boulder's, occupancy, limits, limits of 3 unrelated people is somehow unusual or extreme is is false.
I'm here to ask that the Planning board recommend an exemption to increasing the occupancy limits to the neighborhoods that we've just heard enumerated.
which is occupancy, reform, and the separate matter of zoning for affordable housing.
the airport liaison role you're playing is very important, and it's a very big Development Land Use Development Project.
Because I do have the airport working group, which is pretty active.
I'm just gonna start with just a basic background on how the project started occupancy and zoning for affordable housing.
and then i'm going to pause on the part 3, which is State legislation on land use.
a draft of a new Colorado Senate bill 23 d, 2 1 3, was unveiled that relates to land use statewide.
As part of the inclusionary housing program would help us to meet that 3% goal.
Any any questions on the latest Senate Bill.
Most of the city is actually limited to 3 per unrelated persons or unit.
Rather, some find that the city should just really focus more on increasing in blue cash and loo fees, commercial linkage fees
Would there be any value in addressing what the community has stated as one of the big issues with occupancy which is parking?
ideally we could work with the University to get more dorm rooms built.
This is mostly just going to mean more legal student housing like that's that's basically what you're enabling.
they have not made housing students a priority at all, and the consequence has been a spillover onto the city.
and increase commercial linkage fees to support development of permanently affordable units
So let's move on to affordable house housing, zoning for affordable housing.
obviously most of the time when we say affordable housing, we're talking about deed restricted permanently
Just so you can get more units, and by getting more units it would you would get more on-site affordable units
So we wanted to use diagonal as a as an example of why this these types of changes would get more housing and more deed restricted permanently affordable housing.
So when we apply the the required 25 for inclusionary housing that has to be deed restricted, you would get 30 ih units out of a project there.
I don't remember how many of those parcels have the capacity to put 2 or more units without changing Boulder Valley Comp plan minutes
They supported any kind of process that might go into the next Bvcp. Update to really re envision some areas of the city
we need the developers to be contributing in not just superficial and standard ways to other kinds of transit
the need for review or robust Tdm plans. I realize it's a trade off there.
I would say that reduced parking should be a staff level approval.
you know, making sure they are robust. Tdm. Plans so.
Maybe you get rid of bit of parking minimums, and you put in a charging requirement or something.
as the airport liaison that I think Staff heard our feedback and have incorporated it to a large extent