Map / City Council / ← 2018-08-23 · 2018-08-29 →
City Council · study-session
City of Boulder City Council Study Session 8-28-18
- Date
- Series
- study-session
- Status
- past
- Sources
- YouTube, via the Woven archive; YouTube's automatic captions
Agenda
No agenda items read for this meeting.
Excerpts by topic
AI-read · unreviewed26 mentions; quotes verbatim from the captions or agenda, chosen by a model, unchecked by a personstate law requires that you know these have to be based on specific standards and there has to be decisions
rely on negotiated agreements that would likely not be consistent with Colorado state law
two of the scenarios looked at housing and so both of those with the height and the density bonus
looked at what could we expect in terms of affordable commercial space
the inclusionary zoning amount and the linkage fees owes are kind of things that occur one way or the other
our linkage fees are going up significantly you know City fees all of those things
there have been two challenges to inclusionary housing ordinances that I'm aware of one San Jose and the other one Seattle
getting a longer-lasting TDM program for a higher density might be appropriate
requiring them to provide the affordable commercial space because they had more units in the same footprint
I absolutely agree with an enhanced mitigation particularly TDM for higher density
putting a maximum rent on the space for commercial retail space
TDM would fall into the same category as the childcare sort of thing
there was a cash in lieu option that was almost always available cash in lieu of which would go to affordable housing
had to provide an affordable housing benefit at least 50% of the additional value they derived
cash in lieu was more attractive that was the sort of path of least resistance that the market took
addressing that with dollars that go to provide affordable housing for those who can't afford
with the nexus study additional height that goes to commercial will have a impact on affordability
we've had over the last ten years a lot of really cool smaller houses that represent different parts of our history
it means Net Zero buildings or higher efficiency buildings where new design standards could mean
we're discouraged by staff in both planning in legal from tying back in to the comp plan
I do like the idea of particularly for residential of a minimum requirement for affordable housing
there was an encouragement for family-friendly housing and I learned that had promise as well
we don't get a lot of public art in this town I think we could use some more
which is a public art city and oh my god what a difference that makes
that has served us well on the comp plan and on the open space master plan
it's actually on our work program it grew out of the comp plan
Recording
officialTranscript
derivedRead the transcript 180 segments
Automatic captions: words and names are often misheard.
A part of this recording is left out.
Documents
No documents on record.